Drug price fixation: Sandoz to pay $275 million to settle case

Published On 2025-02-20 10:54 GMT   |   Update On 2025-02-20 10:54 GMT

Sandoz has agreed to pay $275 million to settle claims that it conspired with competitors to fix prices illegally.

Attorneys representing the plaintiffs asked U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe in Philadelphia to give nod for the settlement. Plaintiffs include the City of Providence, Rhode Island, and a New York City police employee benefits plan.

Sandoz denied any wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. The company said it will cooperate with the plaintiffs as they pursue claims against other drugmakers.

As per Reuters report, the antitrust case includes several drug makers that were not part of Friday's settlement, including Pfizer, Teva and Lupin. The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment and have denied wrongdoing.
Sandoz and attorneys for the plaintiffs, "end-purchasers" including consumers who bought Sandoz drugs from pharmacies, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The settlement period covers some purchases between 2009 and 2019 for drugs, including the antidepressants amitriptyline and clomipramine, and for clobetasol, which is used to treat some skin conditions.
The settlement class likely includes millions of members with claims tied to Sandoz’s alleged price-fixing, the plaintiffs' lawyers told the court.
Their court filing said “continued litigation of the claims against Sandoz would be protracted and without guarantee of any recovery.”
The attorneys said they will seek up to $91.6 million in legal fees and $26 million in litigation expenses.
Sandoz last year agreed to pay $265 million to resolve related claims lodged in the litigation by a group of wholesale drug purchasers and others.
The case is In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:16-MD-02724.
Read also: Sandoz US subsidiaries resolve generic drug antitrust class action litigation with direct purchaser class plaintiffs
For end-payor class: Roberta Liebenberg and Jeffrey Istvan of Fine, Kaplan and Black
For Sandoz: Matthew Kent of Alston & Bird
Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News