Emcure wins dismissal of US lawsuit over COVID vaccine trade secrets
The lawsuit said that HDT licensed its technology to Emcure subsidiary Gennova Biopharmaceuticals to develop and sell the vaccine in India. HDT accused Genova of later claiming the vaccine "as its own," applying for two Indian patents on HDT's technology and touting the "indigenously developed" shots in regulatory filings.
Generic drugmaker Emcure Pharmaceuticals convinced a federal court in Seattle, Washington, on Monday to throw out a lawsuit that accused it of stealing trade secrets from biopharma company HDT Bio to develop a COVID-19 vaccine.
A sealed entry in the court's docket said that U.S. District Judge James Robart dismissed the case without prejudice, which means it can be refiled. India-based Emcure had argued that the court lacked jurisdiction over the company.
Representatives for HDT did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for Emcure said on Tuesday morning that the ruling "vindicates our stand."
Seattle-based HDT sued Emcure last year. It said in the lawsuit that it was developing a self-amplyifing RNA (saRNA) shot for COVID-19 that is "safer, cheaper, more portable, and likely more effective" than existing mRNA vaccine technology.
The lawsuit said that HDT licensed its technology to Emcure subsidiary Gennova Biopharmaceuticals to develop and sell the vaccine in India. HDT accused Gennova of later claiming the vaccine "as its own," applying for two Indian patents on HDT's technology and touting the "indigenously developed" shots in regulatory filings.
HDT's lawsuit said that Gennova refused to pay royalties and broke their licensing agreement, requesting at least $950 million in monetary damages. It has also filed a related complaint with the London Court of International Arbitration.
Gennova's COVID-19 vaccine was approved for emergency use by the Indian government last June.
Emcure argued in September that the court lacked jurisdiction over the company because it has no business presence in the United States, and that it and Gennova are "unquestionably distinct separate entities."
"This is an illegitimate lawsuit brought by a company using litigation to compensate for its business shortcomings," Emcure said.
The case is HDT Bio Corp v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd, U.S. District Court for the District of Washington, No. 2:22-cv-00334.
For HDT: Peter Stris, Dana Berkowitz, Kenneth Halpern and John Stokes of Stris & Maher
For Emcure: James Sanders, Amanda Beane and Eric Wolff of Perkins Coie
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.