Gujarat GST Rejects Sanofi India's Rs 11.63 Lakh Refund Application
New Delhi: Sanofi India Limited has informed the stock exchanges that the Deputy Commissioner, State GST, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, has rejected the company's refund application amounting to Rs 11,62,853 relating to the period 2014-15 to 2017-18 (up to July 2017). The company has stated that it will challenge the order before the appropriate appellate authorities.
According to the regulatory filing, the refund application pertained to a mandatory pre-deposit of Rs 11,62,853 made by Sanofi India while filing an appeal under the Central Excise Act, 1944 for the assessment period 2014-15 to 2017-18 (till June 2017). The company had made the mandatory pre-deposit by debiting its Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) and subsequently filed a refund application before the State GST authorities.
The Deputy Commissioner, State GST, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, rejected the refund application on the ground that the claim arose from the debit of the Electronic Credit Ledger towards a mandatory pre-deposit under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and not as "tax" under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, making it ineligible for refund under the CGST Act.
The order further stated that matters relating to mandatory pre-deposits made under the Central Excise Act, 1944 fall within the jurisdiction of the Central GST authorities and not the State GST authorities. Consequently, the refund application filed before the State GST authority was held to be not maintainable.
Sanofi India informed the exchanges that it received the order on June 23, 2026. The company also disclosed that it intends to file appeals before the appropriate Appellate Authorities against the order. Sanofi India further clarified that the rejection of the refund application is not expected to have any material impact on the financial, operational or other activities of the company.
According to the regulatory filing submitted by Sanofi India to the BSE and NSE, the refund application was rejected on jurisdictional and legal grounds relating to the nature of the mandatory pre-deposit, while the company has decided to pursue the matter through the appellate mechanism.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.