Optimal Cervical Dilatation of 6 cm Linked to Decreased Cesarean Delivery Incidence

Written By :  Dr Nirali Kapoor
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-09-20 04:15 GMT   |   Update On 2024-01-19 12:39 GMT

Traditionally, labour can be divided into 3 stages, and the first stage is further subclassified into latent and active phases. A cervical dilation of 4 cm marks the beginning of the active stage of labour. This is the rapid, accelerated phase of labour, in which nulliparas and multiparas are projected to have cervical dilatation rates of 1 cm/hour and 0.5 cm/ hour, respectively.

The caesarean section carries inherent risks of mortality and morbidity for both the mother and the neonates. Previous caesarean delivery is associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture, morbidly adherent placenta, placenta praevia, and severe maternal outcome. Likewise, there is an increased risk of early neonatal death, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. The higher risk of NICU in neonates delivered by elective caesarean section. There is an urgent need to scrutinize and change our intrapartum management of low-risk women especially those without caesarean scars. The objective of this study was to compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes of women who were diagnosed to be in the active phase of labour at 4 cm versus 6 cm cervical os dilatation.

This is a cross-sectional study comparing pregnancy outcomes between participants with 4 and 6 cm of cervical os dilatation at the diagnosis of the active phase of labour. It was conducted in a single tertiary centre involving low-risk singleton pregnancies at or beyond 37 weeks with spontaneous onset of labour. A total of 155 participants were recruited, 101 in group 1 (4 cm) and 54 in group 2 (6 cm). Both groups were similar in mean maternal age, mean gestational age at delivery, ethnicity, median haemoglobin level at delivery, body mass index, and parity.

There were significantly more participants in group 1 who needed oxytocin augmentation (p < 0:001) for the longer mean duration (p = 0:015), use of analgesia (p < 0:001), and caesarean section rate (p = 0:002).

None of the women had a postpartum haemorrhage or a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, and none of the neonates required admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. There were significantly more nulliparas who had a caesarean section as compared to multiparas. A cervical os dilatation of 6 cm reduces the risk of caesarean section by 11% and increases three times more the need for analgesia.

A larger clinical trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study. Authors have recently changed the labour management policy by changing the demarcation of the active phase of labour from 4 to 6 cm cervical dilatation for low-risk women. There will be an opportunity to look at the impact of this modification which will involve a larger sample size.

“Redefining the active phase of labour from 4 to 6 cm is feasible and is associated with a reduced caesarean section rate without significant adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes amongst low-risk women.”

Source: Nadzirah Mohd Fathil, Rahana Abd Rahman, Azmawati Mohd Nawi; Hindawi Journal of Pregnancy Volume 2023

https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8243058


Tags:    
Article Source : Hindawi Journal of Pregnancy

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News