Beyond the Slumber: Study Uncovering the Links Between Sleep Quality, Maternal Health, and Fetal Development

Written By :  Dr Pooja N.
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-07-24 15:00 GMT   |   Update On 2025-07-25 06:27 GMT
Advertisement

Recent comprehensive investigation into the impact of objectively measured sleep during early to mid-pregnancy reveals a complex relationship with maternal and fetal outcomes, along with connections to inflammatory biomarkers. While subjectively experienced sleep disturbances are common among pregnant women, the study emphasizes the discrepancy with objective sleep assessments, urging for a more nuanced understanding of sleep in maternal healthcare.

Focus on Early Pregnancy Sleep Metrics

Despite previous research highlighting sleep disturbances mostly in the third trimester, this study specifically targets early pregnancy—a pivotal time for fetal growth and development. The cohort, comprised of Swedish-speaking women from Uppsala County, was examined using actigraphy to collect data on sleep metrics, including Total Sleep Time (TST) and Sleep Efficiency (SE). Analysis yielded a distribution of sleep quality among participants, categorized as Good, Intermediate, and Poor. Results indicate that poor sleep is predominantly associated with increased odds of requiring an emergency caesarean section; however, no significant links were detected between sleep quality and adverse pregnancy outcomes like preterm birth, gestational diabetes, or preeclampsia after adjusting for confounding factors. Notably, women characterized by poor sleep were more frequently non-European, severely obese, or had pre-existing diabetes, reinforcing the need to consider socioeconomic and demographic factors in sleep research.

Advertisement

Inflammatory Biomarkers and Sleep Quality Connections

Moreover, a nuanced analysis of inflammatory biomarkers exhibited interesting trends: poorer sleep quality correlated with lower levels of certain inflammatory substances, yet increased levels of thrombopoietin were observed among this group. These findings provoke questions regarding the immune response during pregnancy and how sleep disturbances might interact with physiological changes, given the dynamic nature of immune modulation throughout gestation. Although the research methodology utilizing actigraphy provides robust objective sleep measurements, limitations arise from variations in sleep measurement devices and a lack of subjective sleep evaluations. Furthermore, potential confounders, like pre-existing sleep disorders and socioeconomic status, were not factored into the analyses—a critical consideration for future inquiries.

Conclusions and Future Directions in Sleep Studies

In conclusion, while the evidence suggests that poor sleep during early to mid-pregnancy is linked to an increased likelihood of emergency caesarean deliveries, it does not inherently predict major pregnancy complications. Continued exploration into sleep quality, especially regarding diverse populations and its relationship with inflammatory markers, is essential for developing targeted interventions and refining maternal healthcare protocols.

Key Points

- A detailed investigation was conducted on the effects of objectively measured sleep during early to mid-pregnancy, revealing that while subjectively reported sleep disturbances are common among pregnant women, there is a significant discrepancy when compared to objective sleep assessments, necessitating a more nuanced understanding of sleep within maternal healthcare.

- The study focuses on early pregnancy sleep metrics, utilizing actigraphy to measure Total Sleep Time (TST) and Sleep Efficiency (SE) in a cohort of Swedish-speaking women from Uppsala County. Participants' sleep quality was categorized into three groups: Good, Intermediate, and Poor.

- Findings indicate that poor sleep quality is significantly associated with an increased likelihood of emergency caesarean sections. However, after adjusting for confounding factors, no significant associations were established between sleep quality and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth, gestational diabetes, or preeclampsia. Notably, women with poor sleep were often found to be non-European, severely obese, or with pre-existing diabetes.

- A nuanced analysis of inflammatory biomarkers revealed that poorer sleep quality aligns with lower levels of certain inflammatory substances, yet there is an observed increase in thrombopoietin levels among those with poor sleep, raising questions about the interaction between sleep disturbances and immune response during pregnancy.

- The methodological approach using actigraphy for objective sleep measurement was robust, although limitations include device variability in sleep measurement and lack of subjective sleep evaluations. Furthermore, critical confounders such as pre-existing sleep disorders and socioeconomic status were not considered, highlighting an area for future research.

- Overall conclusions suggest that while poor sleep is linked to an increased chance of emergency caesarean sections during early to mid-pregnancy, it does not serve as a predictor for significant pregnancy complications, indicating a need for ongoing research into the interplay between sleep quality, diverse demographics, and inflammatory markers to inform maternal healthcare strategies.

Reference –

Caitlin Macdonald et al. (2025). Sleeping For Two: A Cross-Sectional Study On Associations Between Objectively Measured Sleep During Early To Mid-Pregnancy And Maternal And Fetal Outcomes And Inflammatory Biomarker Profiles. *BMC Pregnancy And Childbirth*, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07634-9.

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News

Medical Bulletin 25/July/2025

Medical Bulletin 23/July/2025