Early bilateral ovary removal may accelerate aging process and specific chronic medical conditions

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-09-15 04:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-09-15 04:32 GMT
Advertisement

Increasing concerns regarding potentially harmful long-term effects of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy (PBO) have caused a decline in the number of women choosing to proactively remove both ovaries as a precaution to protect against ovarian cancer.

Researchers have found in a new study that Premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy was associated with higher odds of specific chronic medical conditions including arthritis, sleep apnea, and asthma .

Advertisement

Findings  of the study are published online today in Menopause, the journal of The Menopause Society.

Hysterectomy is the second-most-frequently performed surgical operation for women after cesarean delivery. Historically, an estimated 23% of women aged 40 to 44 years and 45% of women aged 45 to 59 years have undergone PBO at the time of hysterectomy for the prevention of subsequent ovarian cancer. Many of these women were considered at average risk for ovarian cancer. Recent studies regarding potential negative effects of PBO suggest that the added risks may not always offset the potential benefits, especially in women with an average baseline risk for ovarian cancer. As a result, the rates of PBO have started to decline but only in some geographic areas.

In addition to their reproductive function, the ovaries also affect multiple organs and systems throughout the body. Because they secrete hormones both before and after menopause, the removal of the ovaries can cause an endocrine disruption to multiple tissues and organs, including the brain, muscles, bone, blood vessels, heart, and the gastrointestinal tract. Some prior research also has suggested that there could be an association with cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, or dementia. Most of these studies noted that risk was greatest for women who underwent PBO before the age of 46 years.

However, these earlier studies were based on the passive collection of outcomes primarily through medical record abstraction. In this new study involving more than 500 women, of which slightly more than half had undergone PBO, in-person assessments were completed, on average, 22 years after the PBO.

Compared with the women who had not had PBO, those who underwent the procedure when they were aged younger than 46 years had increased risk of arthritis, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, and bone fractures. They also walked a shorter distance during a 6-minute walk. Women with a history of PBO when aged 46 to 49 years had increased risk of arthritis and obstructive sleep apnea. No significant differences in cognitive status were identified between the two groups of women. The researchers recommend that longitudinal studies with extended follow-up be conducted to assess whether additional differences in cognitive and physical function emerge at older ages.

Study results are published in the article “Long-term effects of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy on physical aging and chronic medical conditions.”

“These results highlight the potential negative long-term effects of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy and are important for women at average risk for ovarian cancer to consider when weighing the risks and benefits of bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy before menopause,” says Dr. Stephanie Faubion, medical director for The Menopause Society.

Reference:

Mielke MM, Kapoor E, Geske JR, Fields JA, LeBrasseur NK, Morrow MM, Winham SJ, Faubion LL, Castillo AM, Hofrenning EI, Bailey KR, Rocca WA, Kantarci K. Long-term effects of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy on physical aging and chronic medical conditions. Menopause. 2023 Sep 12. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002254. 

Tags:    
Article Source : Menopause

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News