Fresh embryo transfer bests frozen embryo in IVF success: Study

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-01-19 12:00 GMT   |   Update On 2021-01-19 12:00 GMT

Boston, Massachusetts: Women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) who used fresh versus frozen embryos derived from freshly retrieved donor eggs had a higher rate of live births, finds a recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Miscarriage rates however, were the same between both groups.While fresh embryos were associated with a higher rate of live births compared...

Login or Register to read the full article

Boston, Massachusetts: Women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) who used fresh versus frozen embryos derived from freshly retrieved donor eggs had a higher rate of live births, finds a recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Miscarriage rates however, were the same between both groups.

While fresh embryos were associated with a higher rate of live births compared to frozen embryos, live birth rates were high for both groups, the researchers noted.

Data has demonstrated that in in vitro fertilization cycles using autologous oocytes, there is a higher live birth rates following cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers compared with fresh embryo transfers. But the association remains unknown in cycles using freshly retrieved donor oocytes. To determine the same, Iris G. Insogna, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues tested the hypothesis that in freshly retrieved donor oocyte cycles, a fresh embryo transfer is more likely to result in a live birth compared with a cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer.

For testing the hypothesis, researchers analyzed data from 33,000 women who received fresh or frozen embryos derived from freshly retrieved donor eggs. The data was from 370 in vitro fertilization clinics in the United States that account for more than 95% of all assisted reproduction nationwide. 

Key findings of the study include:

  • Of a total of 33 863 recipients who underwent 51 942 fresh donor oocyte cycles, there were 15 308 (29.5%) fresh embryo transfer cycles and 36 634 (70.5%) cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
  • Blastocysts were transferred in 92.4% of fresh embryo transfer cycles and 96.5% of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer cycles, with no significant difference in the mean number of embryos transferred.
  • Live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer vs cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer was 56.6% vs 44.0%.
  • Clinical pregnancy rates were 66.7% vs 54.2%, respectively
  • Miscarriage rates were 9.3% vs 9.4%, respectively.

"In cycles using one's own eggs, recent randomized controlled trials comparing pregnancy rates between fresh and frozen embryo transfers have suggested that pregnancy rates are equivalent or possibly higher following frozen embryo transfers," said study author Dr. Insogna. 

"Our study suggests the opposite in cycles using freshly retrieved donor eggs. In fresh donor egg recipients, pregnancy rates were actually higher following fresh embryo transfers compared to frozen embryo transfers," Insogna said in a hospital news release.

"The transfer of either fresh or frozen embryos derived from freshly retrieved donor eggs provides an excellent chance of achieving a pregnancy," Insogna noted.

"For women contemplating achieving a pregnancy using freshly retrieved donor eggs, as well as for their physicians, we feel this study provides valuable guidance," said study senior author Dr. Janis Fox, an attending reproductive endocrinologist in Brigham's Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery.

The study titled, "Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes," is published in the journal JAMA.

DOI: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2774832

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of the American Medical Association

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News