Older women are more likely to produce embryos with the wrong number of chromosomes, which can lead to difficulties conceiving, and increases the risk of miscarriage. Current NICE guidance does not currently recommend routine use of PGT-A, driving women to pursue this test privately or skip it altogether. This guidance is based on previous evidence from studies which had a young average age of participants where the rate of aneuploidy, abnormal number of chromosomes in a cell, is lower. The study also broke new ground by including mosaic embryos, those containing both normal and abnormal cells, which are frequently encountered in IVF but rarely included in research.
The pilot study of 100 women undergoing fertility treatment at King’s Fertility was aimed to fill the evidence gap by focusing on older patients, and assessing the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre randomised controlled trial that explores the test’s impact on pregnancy and live birth rates in women aged 35-42. Both the clinical treatment and embryology procedures for the study were carried out at King’s Fertility.
The unblinded trial was conducted from June 2021 to June 2023. There were 50 patients in the PGT-A group and 50 patients in the control group.
The study showed that the PGT-A test showed a higher cumulative live birth rate after up to three embryo transfers with 72% in the PGT-A group versus 52% in the control group.
Women in the PGT-A group achieved pregnancy in fewer transfers, reducing the time to conception, an important factor for women of advanced reproductive age.
Whilst this is a pilot study and the difference did not reach statistical significance due to the small sample size, the trend suggests a potential benefit that warrants investigation in a larger, multi-centre trial.
Dr Yusuf Beebeejaun, first author of the paper at King’s College London and King’s Fertility, said: “The number of women starting their family above the age of 35 is increasing and women in this age group are more likely to create embryos with the wrong number of chromosomes. This increases the risk of unsuccessful implantation and miscarriages. Our findings suggest that targeted use of PGT-A in this age group could help more women have a baby sooner, while also reducing the emotional toll of repeated unsuccessful cycles.”
Lead author Dr Sesh Sunkara from King’s College London and King’s Fertility added: “By focusing exclusively on women aged 35-42 and including mosaic embryos, we have addressed questions that previous studies have not adequately explored. While larger multi-centre trials are needed to confirm these findings, improving treatment efficiency with a shorter time to achieving pregnancy and live birth could reduce the physical and emotional burden of IVF for women of advanced reproductive age.”
Dr Ippokratis Sarris, Director of King’s Fertility and co-author of the study, said: “This research is a testament to the dedication and expertise of the team at King’s Fertility. Not only were all patients recruited and treated here, but the embryology work was also carried out by our laboratory staff. We are proud to have led this pioneering trial, which addresses one of the most important questions in IVF treatment for women over 35, and we look forward to building on these findings in larger, multi-centre studies.”
Reference:
Beebeejaun Y, Bakalova D, Mania A, Copeland T, Sarris I, Nicolaides K, Capalbo A, Sunkara SK. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Versus Morphological Selection in Women Aged 35-42: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 21;14(14):5166. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145166.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.