Hypertension after pregnancy higher among women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth: BJOG

Written By :  Dr Nirali Kapoor
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-01-26 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-01-26 14:30 GMT

Despite considerable research and attempts to enhance prevention and treatment, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one cause of death among women in developed countries. Gender differences in the clinical presentation and in the response to therapy of CVD are known to impede the decrease of cardiovascular burden in women. Currently, the association between...

Login or Register to read the full article

Despite considerable research and attempts to enhance prevention and treatment, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one cause of death among women in developed countries. Gender differences in the clinical presentation and in the response to therapy of CVD are known to impede the decrease of cardiovascular burden in women.

Currently, the association between hypertensive disorder pregnancy (HDP), such as pre-eclampsia (PE), and elevated cardiovascular risk (CVR) is well established. Because of the possible shared pathophysiological mechanism in placental insufficiency, it has been hypothesised that spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) also predisposes to increased CVR.

There remains a lack of knowledge about whether SPTB is also associated with overall CVR and there are no studies that differentiate between PTB due to hypertensive disorders and SPTB. Due to the high burden of CVD among women, it is important to investigate which pregnancy complications are associated with CVD. The primary aim of this study by JANSSEN et al was to investigate whether women with a history of SPTB were more often diagnosed with hypertension than were women with a history of an uncomplicated term birth.

In this retrospective case–control study, authors included women with a history of SPTB and compared them with women who had a term birth. All were invited for cardiovascular risk assessment 9–16 years after delivery. Women were recruited from obstetrical databases of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), the Netherlands, and gave birth between January 2001 and December 2008. SPTB was defined as preterm birth between 22+6 and 36+6 weeks after spontaneous contractions or spontaneous rupture of membranes.

Main outcome measure was Hypertension. Secondary outcomes included metabolic syndrome, mean blood pressure, anthropometrics, blood and urine sampling, Framingham Risk Score and Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation.

A history of SPTB was significantly associated with hypertension; adjusted odds ratio 1.60 (p = 0.033). Abdominal obesity was more often diagnosed after SPTB (p = 0.003) and was more pronounced with more severe preterm birth (p = 0.002).

In this case–control study, authors found a statistically significantly higher presence of hypertension in women with a history of SPTB than in women with a history of an uncomplicated term birth in the fifth decade of life. They found that 38% of the women with a history of SPTB had hypertension 9–16years after pregnancy. This prevalence is higher than the general Dutch female population within this age group (14.9%) and was also statistically significantly higher compared with controls after adjustment for confounders. Mean DBP was statistically significantly higher among women with a history of SPTB. Abdominal obesity was diagnosed statistically significantly more often among women with a history of SPTB and was associated with the severity of preterm birth.

Women with SPTB were more often diagnosed with hypertension 9–16 years after pregnancy compared with women with an uncomplicated term pregnancy. Future research is necessary to determine whether women with a history of SPTB should be regarded as high risk in cardiovascular screening programmes.

Source: JANSSEN et al; The association between spontaneous preterm birth and maternal hypertension in the fifth decade of life: a retrospective case–control study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2022;00:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471- 0528.17368


Tags:    
Article Source : BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News