Maternal mortality due to complications during and following pregnancy and childbirth is reported to be exceptionally high. Approximately, 75% of all maternal deaths are attributed to severe bleeding and infections (mostly following childbirth), high blood pressure during pregnancy (preeclampsia and eclampsia), complications from delivery, and unsafe abortion. Obstetric haemorrhage is responsible for nearly 47% of maternal deaths in India, followed by infections (12%), and hypertensive disorders (7%) due to pregnancy.
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is defined as blood loss of more than 500 ml and 1000 ml after a vaginal delivery or Csection, respectively. It also includes even a small amount ofblood loss that can make women haemodynamically unstable.
The most common causes include uterine atony, laceration, accidental haemorrhage, and abnormal placentation. Factors that increase the risk of PPH include advanced age, assisted reproduction technology, and advanced age-associated co-morbidities. Even though guidelines recommend oxytocin as the first option, experts consider methylergometrine to be the ideal uterotonic in clinical practice in case of either normal vaginal or C-section delivery. The current consensus article aims to provide a collation of evidence-based literature and clinical insights from the experts on epidemiology, risk factors, and predictors of PPH. The article also provides a consensus on the role of methylergometrine (methylergonovine) in the management of PPH.
Methylergometrine:
Indications
1. Delivery of the placenta
2. Routine treatment of uterine atony
3. Haemorrhage and uterine subinvolution
4. Control of uterine haemorrhage in the second stage of labour after delivery of the infant’s anterior shoulder
Methylergometrine causes a rise in the tone, amplitude, and rate, of rhythmic contractions by acting directly on the uterine smooth muscles. Thus, it shortens the third stage of labour and reduces blood loss by inducing a fast, and sustained tetanic uterotonic effect. It has a rapid onset of action after administration by IV (immediate), IM (2-5 minutes), and after oral (5-10 minutes).
Methylergometrine is contraindicated in the following conditions: 1. Hypertension 2. Toxaemia 3. Pregnancy 4. Hypersensitivity
Methylergometrine is among the first-line drugs for the PPH management after both normal or C-section delivery. Patients with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or medication hypersensitivity shouldn't take methylergometrine. It demonstrates few side-effects or contraindications compared to the other drugs. Some experts prefer IV methylergometrine, while a few of them prefer IM methylergometrine; adding IV methylergometrine with IM methylergometrine also provides good results. Nausea and vomiting are usually seen after 3-4 minutes of methylergometrine administration in C-section patients. This suggests that methylergometrine may not be the only cause of nausea and vomiting and that other factors may also contribute to it during the C-section.
Globally, the major reason for maternal morbidity and mortality is PPH. However, adequate care and treatment can help reduce the mortality rate. The most common cause of PPH is uterine atony. Experts suggest that uterotonics are the first-line treatment for PPH prevention and treatment. Guidelines suggest oxytocin as the first-line medication, experts consider methylergometrine to be used for preventing PPH. Methylergometrine can be given in the IV but is limited to IM form. It has proven to have a superior safety profile in routine practice as compared to other uterotonics. Methylergometrine should only be avoided in patients (20– 25% of the population) who have both anaemia and hypertension. Consequently, methylergometrine is the preferred uterotonic for the vast majority of people. It can be administered either individually or in conjunction with oxytocin to treat PPH. Therefore, the current article suggests that methylergometrine is an efficacious, safe, and cost-effective treatment for PPH management.
Source: Dhore et al. / Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research 2025;12(3):392–399
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.