New Biomarkers Promising for Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes: Study Reveals

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-09-25 15:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-09-25 15:30 GMT
Advertisement

China: Recent research has unveiled promising findings in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by analyzing multiple biomarkers during early pregnancy.

A study published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth has demonstrated that a combination of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) measured between 11 to 14 weeks of gestation can effectively identify women at risk of developing GDM later in their pregnancies.

Advertisement

Gestational diabetes mellitus, characterized by high blood sugar levels that develop during pregnancy, poses significant health risks for both mothers and their infants. Early identification of at-risk women is crucial for implementing preventive measures and improving maternal and fetal outcomes.

It is still uncertain which biomarkers identified in early gestation can effectively predict the later onset of gestational diabetes mellitus. Therefore, Meng-Nan Yang, Xinhua Hospital, Early Life Health Institute, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, Kong-Jiang Road, Shanghai, China, and colleagues aimed to identify the optimal combination of early gestational biomarkers in predicting GDM in machine learning (ML) models.

For this purpose, the researchers conducted a nested case-control study involving 100 pairs of pregnancies—those with GDM and euglycemic controls—within the Early Life Plan cohort in Shanghai, China. They measured various serum biomarkers at 11-14 weeks of gestation, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin-like growth factor I, IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2), total and high molecular weight adiponectin, and glycosylated fibronectin concentrations. Additionally, routine first-trimester blood tests assessed fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum lipids, and thyroid hormones.

To predict GDM, the researchers employed five machine learning models: stepwise logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest, support vector machine, and k-nearest neighbor. The study subjects were randomly divided into two groups: a training set comprising 70 GDM/control pairs and a testing set with 30 pairs. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristics analysis.

The following were the key findings of the study:

  • FPG and IGFBP-2 were consistently selected as predictors of GDM in all ML models.
  • The random forest model, including FPG and IGFBP-2, performed the best (AUC 0.80, accuracy 0.72, sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.57).
  • Adding more predictors did not improve the discriminant power.

The researchers acknowledged several limitations in their study, which was conducted within a large pregnancy cohort. Although they developed a machine learning prediction model using only two predictors—where additional clinical features or biomarkers did not improve the predictions—it's important to note that all participants were of Chinese ethnicity. This necessitates further research involving diverse ethnic groups to evaluate the generalizability of the findings.

In conclusion, the combination of fasting plasma glucose and IGFBP-2 during early gestation shows promise in predicting the later development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with moderate accuracy.

"However, further validation studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this straightforward model in other independent cohorts, as it could serve as a valuable clinical tool for risk monitoring," the researchers wrote.

Reference:

Yang, Meng-Nan, et al. "Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus By Multiple Biomarkers at Early Gestation." BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, p. 601.


Tags:    
Article Source : BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News