New cervicovaginal epigenetic test enables rapid noninvasive screening for endometrial Cancer: Study
Spain: Women experiencing signs of endometrial cancer can now be assessed with a noninvasive, credible test, which can help with early detection and lessen the need for in-person consultations, states a recent study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Over the past ten years, the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) has increased. The primary symptom is abnormal bleeding, which is any postmenopausal, intermenstrual, or prolonged heavy menstrual bleeding. The stage at diagnosis substantially influences EC patient survival. Diagnoses that are made later have a worse chance of survival and demand more intensive care. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) is currently the first step in the diagnosis of suspected EC, which is then followed by hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Improvements in patient care and a shorter time to diagnosis could result from a quick triage method that could rule out malignancies without the requirement for an initial specialist referral.
To achieve this objective, the researchers intended to create and validate a quick, non-invasive, and accurate triage test for EC in order to lessen the need for invasive diagnostic procedures and increase patient survival.
In this study, they discussed the Women's cancer risk IDentification - quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for endometrial cancer (WID-qEC), a three-marker test that assesses DNA methylation in gene areas of GYPC and ZSCAN12. Using 726 cervical smear samples from women with and without EC, researchers developed the test to screen and prioritize women with suspected EC.
They validated the test in 562 cervicovaginal samples using three separate collection methods (cervical smear: n = 248; vaginal swab: n = 63; and self-collection: n = 251) and 4 distinct settings (case/control: n = 388; cohort of women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding: n = 63; a cohort of high-risk women with Lynch syndrome: n = 25; and a nested case/control setting from a screening cohort and samples taken up to 3 years before EC diagnosis: n = 86). Sensitivity, specificity, and estimated negative and positive predictive values (NPV/PPV) were used to assess test performance.
Key findings of the research:
- The test detected EC with sensitivities of 97.2%, 90.1%, and 100% respectively, in cervical, self-collected, and vaginal swab samples derived from symptomatic patients. The corresponding specificities were 75.8%, 86.7%, and 89.1%.
- 90.9% of EC cases were detected by the WID-qEC in samples taken up to a year before diagnosis.
- Performance on the test was comparable regardless of menopausal state, age, stage, grade, ethnicity, and histology.
"The WID-qEC may be a useful tool for managing women with atypical bleeding because it can be used in self-collected samples, especially where access to specialized care is limited. The best settings to use this test in for early detection and preventive screening will be determined by additional research", added the researchers.
The authors concluded that for screening and prioritizing women with symptoms suggestive of EC or those at risk of EC, the WID-qEC may be a user-friendly test.
Reference:
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00266 Journal of Clinical Oncology
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.