Prophylactic Tranexamic acid usage fails to substantially reduce post C-section bleeding

Written By :  Dr.Niharika Harsha B
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-04-15 03:45 GMT   |   Update On 2023-04-15 05:44 GMT
Advertisement

According to a new study,Tranexamic acid appears no more effective than placebo in reducing the need for blood transfusion or preventing maternal death in patients with increased risk for excessive bleeding because of cesarean delivery. The study has revealed that Tranexamic acid prophylactic usage during cesarean birth did not result in a substantially decreased risk of a composite outcome of maternal mortality or blood transfusion compared to placebo.

Advertisement

The study results were published in the journal The New England Journal of Medicine. 

Postpartum Hemorrhage is one of the major causes of maternal mortality. Previous studies indicate that tranexamic acid can improve hemostasis by fibrinolytic inhibition. But there is uncertainty if the administration of tranexamic acid immediately after umbilical-cord clamping would lead to a lower risk of maternal death or blood transfusion than a placebo among patients undergoing scheduled or emergency cesarean delivery. Hence researchers conducted a study to assess the effect on the need for blood transfusions. 

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial at 31 hospitals participating in the Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either tranexamic acid or a placebo after umbilical cord clamping. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or blood transfusion by hospital discharge or 7 days after delivery, whichever occurred first. The key secondary outcomes were the anticipated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter (prespecified as a significant secondary objective), interventions for bleeding and associated challenges, the preoperative-to-postoperative change in hemoglobin level, and postpartum infectious issues. Adverse events were evaluated. 

Key findings: 

  • A total of 11,000 participants underwent randomization.
  • Out of the total, 5529 were randomized to the tranexamic acid group and 5471 to the placebo group; scheduled cesarean delivery accounted for 50.1% and 49.2% of the deliveries in the respective groups.
  • Nearly 201 of 5525 participants (3.6%) in the tranexamic acid group and 233 of 5470 (4.3%) in the placebo group had an occurrence of the primary outcome. 
  • Estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter occurred in 7.3% of tranexamic acid group participants and 8.0% of placebo group participants.
  • Interventions for bleeding complications occurred in 16.1% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and 18.0% of those in the placebo group; the change in the hemoglobin level was −1.8 g per deciliter and −1.9 g per deciliter, respectively; and postpartum infectious complications occurred in 3.2% and 2.5% of the participants, respectively.
  • The frequencies of thromboembolic events and other adverse events were similar in the two groups. 

Thus, Tranexamic acid prophylactic usage during cesarean birth did not result in a substantially decreased risk of a composite outcome of maternal mortality or blood transfusion compared to placebo. 

Further reading: Pacheco LD, Clifton RG, Saade GR, et al. Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Obstetrical Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(15):1365-1375. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207419

Tags:    
Article Source : The New England Journal of Medicine

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News