Study finds direct correlation between number of eggs at retrieval and pregnancy rate among women above 40

Published On 2024-11-07 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-08 09:34 GMT

In August 2010 the Quebec Government funded the costs of in vitro fertilization in exchange for greater use of single embryo transfer. As a result, stimulation protocols became gentler. S. Ouhilal et al sought to determine the optimal number of eggs at oocyte retrieval by carrying out a Cohort study.

Authors compared the number of eggs at oocyte retrieval and the clinical pregnancy rate in all our fresh stimulated cycles between August 2010 and December 2012. The number of eggs at retrieval were divided as follows: 1–4 eggs, 5 to 9 eggs, 10–14 eggs, 15–19 eggs, >20 eggs. Data was subdivided based on age less than 35, age 35-39, and age 40 and over.

A total of 1615 consecutive stimulated fresh IVF cycle starts that resulted in retrieval of at least one egg were analyzed. In women age less than 35 (n=590), the clinical pregnancy rate was optimal (≥44%) when there were at least 10 eggs at retrieval. For women with 1–4 eggs at retrieval it was 30.8% and for 5–9 eggs it was 36.2%. In women age 35–39 (n=543), optimal pregnancy rates (34.8%) were achieved with 5–9 eggs at retrieval. Less than 5 eggs significantly reduced the pregnancy rate (15.6%) whereas more than 10 eggs yielded pregnancy rates between 28 and 29%. In women over 40 (n=482), authors found a stepwise improvement in pregnancy rates with increased number of eggs at retrieval (1–4: 11%, 5–9: 21%, 10–14: 26%, 15–19: 33%).

In women 40 and over, there is a direct correlation between the number of eggs at retrieval and pregnancy rate whereas in women age less than 35 there was no improvement in pregnancy rates beyond 10 eggs. Interestingly, in women age 35 to 39, a modest number of eggs at retrieval (5–9) is associated with the best outcomes.

Source: S. Ouhilal, H. Lachgar, N. Mahutte. Montreal Fertility Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; FertilitySterilty

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News