Study Links Chronic Endometritis to Abnormal Uterine Bleeding; Antimicrobial Therapy Shows Promise

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
facebook icontwitter iconauthor icon
Published On 2025-04-23 15:30 GMT   |   Update On 2025-04-23 15:30 GMT
Study Links Chronic Endometritis to Abnormal Uterine Bleeding; Antimicrobial Therapy Shows Promise
  • whatsapp icon
Advertisement

Italy: A recent prospective observational study published in the International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics has revealed a high prevalence of chronic endometritis (CE) in women with nonstructural abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), with 70.3% of participants diagnosed with the condition.

The study highlights the significant role of CE in abnormal bleeding patterns in the absence of structural uterine abnormalities. Targeted antimicrobial therapy led to notable improvements in bleeding outcomes, with women cured of CE experiencing fewer bleeding days, better pictorial blood assessment chart scores at 3 and 6 months, and higher serum hemoglobin and ferritin levels than those with persistent CE. These findings emphasize the potential benefits of antimicrobial treatment in managing nonstructural AUB.

Advertisement

The causal relationship between chronic endometritis and nonstructural abnormal uterine bleeding remains inadequately explored, necessitating further investigation. Therefore, Pierpaolo Nicolì from the University of Bari “Aldo Moro,” Policlinico of Bari, Bari, BA, Italy, and colleagues aimed to assess the prevalence of chronic endometritis in women with nonstructural abnormal uterine bleeding and evaluate the impact of CE treatment on menstrual blood loss patterns.

For this purpose, the researchers conducted a prospective study between 2022 and 2024 at the University of Bari, Italy, involving women aged 20–45 with nonstructural AUB undergoing hysteroscopy. Chronic endometritis was diagnosed based on hysteroscopic and histologic/immunohistochemical (HIS/IHC) criteria. Women with CE received culture-guided therapy, and cure was confirmed by triple negativity (hysteroscopy, HIS/IHC, and culture) in Group A. If CE persisted, up to three therapy courses were administered (Group B). Participants completed a bleeding characteristics questionnaire and had serum hemoglobin and ferritin levels assessed at enrollment and post-treatment.

The following were the key findings of the study:

  • Chronic endometritis was diagnosed in 70.3% of women with nonstructural abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) enrolled in the study.
  • Among the 102 CE patients, 81 (79.4%) showed CE resolution after therapy (group A), while 21 (20.6%) had persistent CE (group B).
  • The duration of heavy bleeding before treatment (baseline) was similar in both groups.
  • At the end of treatment, group A showed significant reductions in days of heavy bleeding, spotting, and Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) scores compared to their baseline and group B.
  • Serum hemoglobin and ferritin levels were significantly higher in women with resolved CE (group A) than those with persistent CE (group B).
  • PBAC scores in group A remained significantly improved 3 and 6 months after treatment, indicating persistent benefits.
  • Both univariate and multivariate regressions revealed a significant association between the cure of CE and reduced bleeding in patients.

The study highlights a high prevalence of chronic endometritis among women with nonstructural abnormal uterine bleeding. Notably, targeted antimicrobial therapy proved effective, with CE cure leading to marked and sustained improvements in bleeding patterns, emphasizing the clinical value of identifying and treating CE in this population.

Reference:

Cicinelli, E., Nicolì, P., Vimercati, A., Cicinelli, R., Marinaccio, M., Matteo, M., & Vitagliano, A. High prevalence of chronic endometritis in women with nonstructural abnormal uterine bleeding and benefits of antimicrobial treatment on blood loss pattern: A prospective, observational study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70115


Tags:    
Article Source : International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News