Study Warns of Increased Risk of Postpartum Urinary Retention Following Cesarean Section

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-05-01 15:15 GMT   |   Update On 2025-05-01 15:15 GMT
Advertisement

China: A recent retrospective analysis based on a nationwide inpatient sample has found that postpartum urinary retention (PUR) affects around 0.20% of women undergoing cesarean section (CS) in the United States. Although relatively rare, PUR is clinically significant due to its association with various risk factors and adverse outcomes.

The study showed that women aged 25 and older, especially those above 35 and those with pre-existing comorbidities (OR 1.51–1.79) were more likely to develop PUR. Conditions such as fluid and electrolyte imbalances (OR 2.46), paralysis (OR 3.24), and recent weight loss (OR 2.34) further elevated the risk.

Advertisement

"Key contributing complications included catheter placement (OR 22.57), bladder and renal injuries (OR 6.12), renal failure (OR 4.74), and puerperal infections (OR 3.31). On the other hand, a history of prior CS and undergoing low cervical cesarean deliveries appeared to reduce the risk, indicating a potential protective effect," the researchers reported in BMC Women’s Health.

Jian Wang from Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, and colleagues conducted the study. Their goal was to assess risk factors for PUR after cesarean delivery and evaluate associated morbidity using a population-based retrospective case-control design.

For this purpose, the team analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (2010–2019), categorizing women based on whether they experienced PUR post-CS. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors, adjusting for maternal demographics and clinical variables.

Key findings included:

  • Analysis of 2,397,168 cesarean deliveries from the NIS database.
  • PUR incidence stood at 0.20%.
  • Affected patients had longer hospital stays, higher medical costs, and more complications.
  • The risk was elevated in women aged ≥25, particularly ≥35.
  • Asian and Pacific Islander women had a higher PUR risk.
  • One or more comorbidities significantly increased the likelihood.
  • Deliveries at large, teaching or Eastern hospitals were more prone to PUR.
  • Coagulation disorders, electrolyte disturbances, neurological issues, paralysis, and recent weight loss were notable risk factors.
  • PUR was linked to complications such as bladder or ureteral injury, acute renal failure, respiratory failure, endometritis, hemorrhage, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, peritonitis, puerperal infections, and chorioamnionitis.
  • Obstetric factors like cephalopelvic disproportion, fetal malposition, placenta previa, multiple gestation, and abnormal bladder anatomy raised the risk.
  • Bladder catheter placement and IV infusion were strongly associated with PUR, with catheter use showing the highest odds.
  • Conversely, previous CS, low cervical CS, and cord prolapse were associated with reduced PUR risk.

The authors concluded that PUR is relatively uncommon, however, it carries significant clinical implications. They stressed the need for antenatal screening to identify high-risk patients and advocated for an elective over emergency CS when feasible.

"Early intervention during the antenatal and postnatal periods could help mitigate the risk and improve patient outcomes," they wrote.

Reference:

Zhang, F., Huang, J., Huang, X. et al. Incidence and risk factors of postpartum urinary retention following cesarean section: a retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study. BMC Women's Health 25, 180 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03728-w


Tags:    
Article Source : BMC Women's Health

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News