Trial evaluates contraceptive efficacy of Mirena Intrauterine System through 8 years

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-10-07 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-10-07 14:30 GMT
Advertisement

Findings support the continued use of 52-mg LNG-IUS for up to 8 years in women wishing to continue treatment.

USA: Findings from the Mirena Extension trial have shown the high contraceptive efficacy, a favorable safety profile, and user satisfaction of 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (52-mg LNG-IUS) through 8 years of use. The findings were published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 

Advertisement

A total of 26 post-treatment pregnancies were reported, of which 24 occurred in women who discontinued 52-mg LNG-IUS because of their wish for pregnancy. The bleeding pattern remained highly favorable in women who elected to continue use for eight years.

The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is a long-acting contraceptive option with approval for its use for up to 7 years. The Mirena Extension Trial by Jeffrey T Jensen, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA, and colleagues evaluated the safety and efficacy of 52-mg LNG-IUS during extended use beyond 5 and 8 years.

The multicenter, single-arm study in the US enrolled existing users of 52-mg LNG-IUS for 4.5-5 years aged 18-35 years. The researchers assessed the contraceptive efficacy (Pearl Index) and the cumulative failure rate (using the Kaplan-Meier method) of 52-mg LNG-IUS during extended use. Bleeding outcomes and adverse events were also evaluated.

Two hundred forty-three entered, and 223 completed eight years of 52-mg LNG-IUS use out of 362 participants starting Year 6. Just over half the participants were parous. The mean age was 29.2 years, and all participants were ≤36 years at the end of Year 8.

The study demonstrated the following findings:

  • Two pregnancies occurred during years 6 through 8 of Mirena IUS use, Both with the device in situ. The Year 6 pregnancy was of unknown location and resolved spontaneously.
  • In Year 7, the pregnancy was ectopic and resolved with methotrexate treatment. The 52-mg LNG-IUS was removed in both cases, and the participants left the trial.
  • For years 6-8, the 3-year Pearl Index was 0.28, with a 3-year cumulative failure rate of 0.68%.
  • Pearl Indexes for Years 6, 7, and 8 were 0.34, 0.40, and 0.00.
  • The Pearl Index for 3-year (6-8) ectopic pregnancy was 0.14.
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events were found in 249/362 participants (68.8%), with 65 (18.0%) events considered related to the 52-mg LNG-IUS.
  • The discontinuation rate was 38.4%, most commonly due to a wish for pregnancy (12.2%, 44/362).
  • During extended use beyond five and up to 8 years, participants reported a decrease in the mean number of bleeding/spotting days, with approximately half of the women experiencing amenorrhea or irregular bleeding.
  • The researchers did not enroll a sufficient number of women using 52-mg LNG-IUS for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding to assess the indication's extended use.
  • At the end of Year 8, most (98.7%) of the participants who completed the study remained satisfied with the continued use of 52-mg LNG-IUS.
  • Of the 31 women who discontinued early due to wish for pregnancy with evaluable data for return-to-fertility analysis, 24 reported a post-treatment pregnancy within one year, giving a 12-month return-to-fertility rate of 77.4%.

The researchers conclude, "these findings support the continued use of 52-mg LNG-IUS for up to 8 years in women wishing to continue treatment."

Reference:

Jensen JT, Lukkari-Lax E, Schulze A, Wahdan Y, Serrani M, Kroll R. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of 52mg LNG-IUS for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 9:S0002-9378(22)00729-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.007. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36096186.


Tags:    
Article Source : American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News