Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major healthcare issue characterised by the descent of one or more of the female pelvic organs (bladder, uterus, rectum, vaginal walls or vaginal cuff), affecting up to 50% of postmenopausal women. Frequently, it can be associated with symptoms such as pelvic pressure or discomfort, urinary incontinence or difficulties in urinating, bowel dysfunctions and discomfort during sexual intercourse, having a detrimental impact on sexual function and overall quality of life. The descent of the pelvic organs is often inextricably bound up with a very common comorbid condition: the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), comprising vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) that also plays a crucial role. This pathologic condition is strongly connected to weakening or damage of pelvic floor muscles and connective tissues, often occurring during postmenopause along with declining oestrogen levels, with incidence rising with age.
Although separating menopause effects from general ageing is arduous, the oestrogen-responsiveness of pelvic organs and surrounding epithelium, connective and muscular tissues is well-established. The decline of endogenous oestrogen levels gradually leads to thinning of the vaginal wall, causing dryness, soreness and irritation: factors all contributing to a vicious cycle, worsening POP severity. For all these reasons, despite surgical repair remaining the mainstay treatment for symptomatic prolapse, considerable attention has been paid to perioperative vaginal oestrogen as a potential aid in maximising surgical outcomes.
To clarify the state of evidence, authors conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) available in the literature up to December 31, 2024 on the topic, intending to shed light on the ongoing long-standing issue: does perioperative vaginal therapy with oestrogen have any impact on the perioperative outcomes of postmenopausal women with POP who undergo vaginal surgical repair?
Only prospective, randomised controlled trials (RCT) examining perioperative vaginal oestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women undergoing POP surgery were included. Study identification and data extraction were independently performed by two and three authors, respectively. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess bias, with disagreements resolved by a fourth reviewer.
Ten studies involving 709 patients were analysed. Vaginal oestrogen therapy showed a positive effect on Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI), vaginal thickness and surgeon's perception of tissue quality. It also appeared to reduce postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) and antibiotic use. However, no significant impact on sexual function, surgical ease, rates of surgical failure or POP recurrence was observed.
Among the outcomes assessed in the included trials, cytological and histological changes of the vaginal tissue after oestrogen treatment are the most frequently investigated (7 out of 10 studies), with the majority evidencing a favourable impact of oestrogen therapy on VMI and vaginal thickness at surgery. Nevertheless, results regarding the presence of granulation tissue after local oestrogen treatment were inconclusive.
Data concerning the impact of perioperative vaginal oestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women undergoing surgery for POP are limited. To date, the preponderance of evidence supports the use of vaginal oestrogens before surgical interventions for POP, based on objective improvements in tissue quality at surgery and likely decreased frequency of early postoperative infections (including UTIs). Nevertheless, ongoing postoperative use of local oestrogen for preventing recurrent prolapse is not supported by the literature and current evidence is too weak to draw any solid conclusion. So far, no clear impact on sexual function, quality of life, surgical ease or POP recurrence seems to stand out. Further research should better address the role of vaginal oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women before and after vaginal surgical repair for POP, with more trials following standardised protocols (uniformizing compounds, posology, therapy lengths, surgical techniques and time points of measurement), with the aim to provide more accurate scientific evidence on the impact on perioperative outcomes and possible benefits or harms of vaginal oestrogen therapy in this category of patients.
Source: Gilda Sicilia, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Maurizio Nicola D'Alterio; BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2025; 0:1–14 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.