Oral paclitaxel with encequidar improves overall survival and progression-free survival in breast cancer

Written By :  Jacinthlyn Sylvia
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-07-22 14:15 GMT   |   Update On 2022-07-22 14:15 GMT
Advertisement

USA: Compared to intravenous paclitaxel (IVpac), oral paclitaxel plus Encequidar (oPac + E) improved the confirmed tumor response while showing trends in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), says an article published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Neuropathy makes intravenous paclitaxel more difficult to administer; therefore, premedication is necessary to avoid hypersensitivity-like symptoms. The new P-glycoprotein pump inhibitor encequidar (E), which is used to treat paclitaxel, improves oral absorption. In order to compare the effectiveness and safety of oPac + E once daily for three consecutive days per week with IVpac at the authorized dose and schedule, 175 mg/m2 once every three weeks in patients with mBC, Hope S. Rugo and colleagues conducted a phase III study.

Advertisement

With balanced demographics and past treatments, 400 Latin American patients (265 oPac + E, 137 IVpac) were included. The primary endpoint was determined by blinded independent central review and was confirmed by radiographic response using RECIST 1.1. Progression-free survival and overall survival were secondary endpoints.

The key findings of this study were as follows:

1. In comparison to 23% for IVpac, the confirmed response (intent-to-treat) for oPac + E was 36%.

2. The OS was 22.7 months as opposed to 16.5 months, and the PFS was 8.4 months as opposed to 7.4 months. 55% of oPac + E and 53% of IVpac adverse events were grade 3-4.

3. In comparison to IVpac, oPac + E had higher rates of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and neutropenic complications, especially in patients with elevated liver enzymes.

4. However, it had lower incidence and severity of neuropathy (2% v 15% > grade 2) and alopecia (49% v 62% all grades).

5. Treatment was a factor in 3% of on-study fatalities and 0% of on-study deaths (8% oPac + E vs. 9% IVpac).

In conclusion, oPac + E group increased the confirmed tumor response better than IVpac. The Authors also found that in oPac + E group, neuropathy was less common while neutropenic infections were more common in patients with increased liver enzyme levels at baseline. 

Reference:

Rugo, H. S., Umanzor, G. A., Barrios, F. J., Vasallo, R. H., Chivalan, M. A., Bejarano, S., Ramírez, J. R., Fein, L., Kowalyszyn, R. D., Kramer, E. D., Wang, H., Kwan, M.-F. R., & Cutler, D. L. (2022). Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study Comparing Oral Paclitaxel Plus Encequidar Versus Intravenous Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. In Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.21.02953

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Clinical Oncology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News