Aflibercept 8mg noninferior to Aflibercept 2mg in nAMD Treatment: PULSAR Trial

Written By :  Dr.Niharika Harsha B
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-08-09 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-08-09 14:30 GMT
Advertisement

New research revealed that aflibercept 8 mg was non-inferior to aflibercept 2 mg and provided more significant therapeutic benefit, prolonged injection interval, and similar safety compared to aflibercept 2 mg. The study was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting and published in the journal Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration, also known as exudative or wet AMD is a common, progressive retinal degenerative macular disease that is characterized by neovascularization of the choroid, mainly affecting the elderly population leading to gradual vision impairment. Anti-VEGF is the main modality of the treatment of nAMD. Aflibercept, a 115 kDa completely human recombinant fusion protein that binds to VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factor (PlGF), is made up of the immunoglobulin binding domains of VEGF receptors 1 and 2. Recent literature has shown that aflibercept 2mg can be used for naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Hence researchers conducted a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg injection administered every 12 (8q12) or 16 weeks (8q16) for the management of treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). 

Advertisement

PULSAR trial is an ongoing, double-masked, 96-week, Phase 3 trial that recruited patients aged ≥50 years with nAMD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive 8q12, 8q16, or 2q8 of aflibercept 8 mg injection and 2mg injection. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline and measured at Week 48 by a non-inferiority margin at four letters was considered as the primary endpoint. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with no intraretinal/subretinal fluid (IRF/SRF) in the central subfield at Week 16, and other secondary endpoints included safety. The proportion of patients with ≥12-week and 16-week treatment intervals through Week 48 was the Exploratory endpoint. 

Results: 

  • Nearly 1009 patients with a mean±SD age of 74.5±8.4 years () were evaluated, of which there were 54.5% female.
  • There were 335 in the 8q12 group, 338 in the 8q16 group, and 336 in the 2q8. 
  • Aflibercept 8 mg met the primary endpoint (8q12 vs. 2q8: p=0.0009; 8q16 vs. 2q8: p=0.0011).
  • Observed mean (±SD) change from baseline (±SD) in BCVA at Week 48 was +6.7±12.6, +6.2±11.7, and +7.6±12.2 letters with 8q12, 8q16, and 2q8, respectively.
  • In the 8q12 group, 79% of patients (n=316) maintained 12-week treatment intervals, and 77% of patients in the 8q16 group (n=312) maintained 16-week treatment intervals in Year 1.
  • Overall, 83% (n=628) of patients receiving aflibercept 8 mg maintained ≥12-week treatment intervals in Year 1.
  • Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated superior drying versus aflibercept 2 mg at Week 16; 63% versus 52% of patients, respectively, had no IRF/SRF in the central subfield (p=0.0002).
  • Aflibercept 8 mg had a similar safety profile to aflibercept 2 mg.  

Thus, Aflibercept 8 mg was safe, and efficacious and was maintained by the patients for ≥12-week dosing, and 16-week dosing than Aflibercept 2 mg. 

Further reading: Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 48-week results from the Phase 3 PULSAR trial. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):461.

Tags:    
Article Source : Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News