Aflibercept Improves Contrast sensitivity in Diabetic Macular Edema

Written By :  MD Bureau
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-01-25 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-01-25 03:30 GMT
Advertisement

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of decreased best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and irreversible vision loss, with up to 10% of diabetic patients affected. A recent study suggests that contrast sensitivity (CS) can be improved with aflibercept therapy. The study findings were published in the journal Clinical Ophthalmology on November 11, 2021.

There is a growing body of literature that demonstrates patients with center involving diabetic macular edema (CDME) and diabetic retinopathy suffer from decreased contrast sensitivity (CS) before there are any detectable changes in visual acuity. It is unknown at this time whether the patients that lose CS associated with diabetic macular edema will regain what they have lost once they meet current treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recommendations and begin intravitreal treatment.

Advertisement

Therefore, Dr Donald R Nixon and his team conducted a study to evaluate the changes in CS and its association with BCVA and Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in patients undergoing standard treatment for CDME using aflibercept.

Aflibercept is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor first approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in July 2014 after several large trials showed it was superior to laser photocoagulation in patients with reduced visual acuity.

Dr Donald and his team conducted a single-centre, prospective, open-label, non-controlled evaluation of five aflibercept intravitreal injections for treatment of CDME over 16 weeks. They included a total of 40 eyes from 40 patients with CDME and administered aflibercept every 4 weeks. They assessed the measurements of a central retinal thickness (CRT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Pelli–Robson (PR) CS, and CamBlobs (CB) CS at 20 weeks post-baseline.

Key findings of the study:

♦ At baseline, the researchers observed that

  • CRT was 365 ± 94.6μm with logMAR BCVA 0.25± 0.20.
  • CS PR was 1.46± 0.13 logCS compared to the normal population 1.79± 0.10 logCS and
  • CS CB was 1.55± 0.16 logCS compared to 1.92± 0.08 logCS in the normal population.

♦ By the end of the study, they found that the CRT was decreased to 289 ± 43.7μm, and the logMAR BCVA improved to 0.18± 0.02.

♦ They also found that the CS PR was 1.52± 0.16 and CS CB was 1.62± 0.16 logCS.

♦ They noted that at the end of the study, 85% of eyes obtained BCVA of 0.3 logMAR or better.

♦ They observed a reduction from a baseline of 82.5% to 57.5% in the number of patients that had a CS.

♦ They noted that the greatest improvement in CS was associated with those patients that had the greatest reduction in CRT.

The authors concluded, "CS impairment in patients with CDME is significant. Although treatment can be associated with improvement, there still remains a group with decreased CS that could impact activities of daily living. Earlier intervention using reduction in CS as a metric may be associated with reduced residual deficit associated with treatment."

For further information:

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S338478


Tags:    
Article Source :  Clinical Ophthalmology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News