Bilateral implantation of trifocal IOLs optimal option for correcting presbyopia: JAMA

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-09-26 14:00 GMT   |   Update On 2022-09-26 14:00 GMT

Bilateral implantation of trifocal IOLs optimal option for correcting presbyopia suggests a recent study published in the JAMA Ophthalmology A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in clinical practice. A study was done to compare outcomes of presbyopia-correcting IOLs frequently recommended...

Login or Register to read the full article

Bilateral implantation of trifocal IOLs optimal option for correcting presbyopia suggests a recent study published in the JAMA Ophthalmology

A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in clinical practice.

A study was done to compare outcomes of presbyopia-correcting IOLs frequently recommended in clinical practice through a bayesian NMA based on a systematic review.

Based on the research question, randomized clinical trials assessing multifocal IOLs in patients who underwent bilateral cataract extraction were searched. Nonrandomized studies, studies in patients with unilateral or contralateral cataract extractions, duplicated studies, conference abstracts, and nonpeer-reviewed articles were excluded.

Results:

  • This NMA included 27 studies comprising 2605 patients.
  • For uncorrected near visual acuity, trifocal IOLs and old bifocal diffractive IOLs afforded better visual acuity than monofocal IOLs.
  • Regarding uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, extended depth-of-focus IOLs provided better visual acuity than monofocal IOLs.
  • However, there were no differences between extended depth-of-focus and trifocal diffractive IOLs in pairwise comparisons.
  • For uncorrected distant visual acuity, all multifocal IOLs were comparable with monofocal IOLs. There were no statistical differences between multifocal and monofocal IOLs regarding contrast sensitivity, glare, or halos.

Thus, for patients considering a multifocal IOL due to presbyopia, bilateral implantation of a trifocal IOL might be an optimal option for patients without compromising distant visual acuity.

Reference:

Cho J, Won YK, Park J, et al. Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality of Accommodative, Multifocal, Extended Depth-of-Focus, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopia-Correcting Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online September 22, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3667

Keywords:

Bilateral, implantation, trifocal, IOLs, optimal, option, correcting, presbyopia, JAMA Ophthalmology, Cho J, Won YK, Park J, Visual Outcomes, Optical Quality, Accommodative, Multifocal, Extended Depth-of-Focus, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Ophthalmology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News