Intravitreal conbercept with photocoagulation and phacoemulsifcation in Neovascular glaucoma effectively reduces IOP
Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a complex refractory glaucoma with a high rate of blindness. The disease mostly occurs in people over 40 years of age, so timely and reliable measures should be given to avoid vision loss. The main causes are ocular ischemic syndrome, fundus retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, and other ocular ischemic diseases. Clinical manifestations are difficult to control high intraocular pressure, irreversible visual impairment, and intractable eye pain, often complicated by a variety of eye diseases, such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, and so on. At present, for NVG patients with cataracts, trabeculectomy, goniosynechialysis combined with phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation are mainly performed to reduce intraocular pressure and restore vision.
This study by Xue Li and Dawei Zhang investigated the effect of intravitreal injection of conbercept combined with minimally invasive photocoagulation and phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation in the treatment of NVG patients with cataracts.
A total of 84 patients with NVG complicated with cataracts who were admitted to hospital from September 2019 to September 2021 were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the study group and the control group, with 42 cases in each. The control group underwent minimally invasive photocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. The study group was given an intravitreal injection of conbercept first, followed by minimally invasive photocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation 3 to 7 days after the injection. The intraocular pressure and visual acuity of the two groups before surgery, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the operation were compared. The levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were compared between the two groups before the operation and 1 week after the operation. The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was statistically compared
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.