Less pupil variation in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery than Phacoemulsification
Cataract Surgery
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) emerged as a novel technique in 2009. Since then, this technique has evolved considerably, covering several of the conventional surgical steps previously performed in a manual manner (incisions, lens fragmentation, and capsulotomy). The safety and effectiveness of FLACS is consensually established, with considerable evidence. However, intraoperative miosis has been associated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, which renders inherent difficulties regarding nuclear fragmentation, cortex removal, intraocular implantation of the lens, and increases the risk of posterior capsule rupture. This undesired side effect is frequently reported in the vast majority of publications regarding FLACS, which, almost invariably, do not differentiate femtosecond laser based on the pulse pattern, i e, between low and energy pulse femtosecond lasers or do not contemplate low energy pulse at all.
The study by Salgado et al aimed to further investigate on the pupil area changes with low energy pulse FLACS and compare it against the standard phacoemulsification. For this matter, an intraindividual study was performed. This study showed no significant pupil changes, namely myosis, after low-energy FLACS pre-treatment. Comparison between techniques showed less pupil variation in FLACS as compared to CP, more markedly in eyes with comorbidities (particularly with shallow anterior chamber), although non-statistically significant.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.