Measurement of Barrett's Index simple method for diagnosing Dysthyroid Optic Neuropathy

Written By :  Dr Ishan Kataria
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-11-08 04:15 GMT   |   Update On 2022-11-08 08:53 GMT

Graves' ophthalmopathy is a common autoimmune disease of the orbit. It presents with a variety of manifestations such as proptosis, lid retraction, diplopia, and optic neuropathy. One of the most serious visual loss threats for patients with GO is dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON), the diagnosis of which includes clinical characteristics such as decreased visual acuity, presence of...

Login or Register to read the full article

Graves' ophthalmopathy is a common autoimmune disease of the orbit. It presents with a variety of manifestations such as proptosis, lid retraction, diplopia, and optic neuropathy. One of the most serious visual loss threats for patients with GO is dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON), the diagnosis of which includes clinical characteristics such as decreased visual acuity, presence of relative afferent pupillary defect, color defect, and visual field defect. The most common pathology of DON is enlargement of extraocular muscles causing compression of the optic nerve.

Orbital Computed Tomography (CT) is useful in the assessment of crowding of the ocular muscle and swelling of soft tissue. The Barrett' index (BI), proposed by Barrett et al, is an assessment of muscle expansion as a percentage of horizontal or vertical extraocular muscles occupied by the height or width axis. It is a good indicator of DON detection, with high sensitivity and specificity at BI 67%.Some researchers previously reported that fat prolapse through superior ophthalmic fissure is a good indicator for diagnosing DON.

It is generally accepted that anatomical muscle and orbital size can vary with gender, age, and ethnicity and reports of the use of BI and fat prolapse as an indicator for diagnosis of DON in Southeast Asian populations are very limited. The purposes of study by Kemchoknatee et al was to evaluate and compare the performance of BI and fat prolapse in detecting dysthyroid optic neuropathy, and to study the correlation of BI and fat prolapse with visual status.

Between January 2011 and December 2020, orbits affected by GO were retrospectively reviewed and classified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of DON. All orbital-computed-tomography (CT) scans were measured for BI and fat prolapse. Diagnostic performance of BI and fat prolapse was analyzed and evaluated in relation to visual outcome.

Study included orbits with DON (23 orbits) and the absence of DON (61 orbits). BI was significantly higher in patients in the DON group (47.68 ± 12.52%) compared to the absence of DON (37.55 ± 10.88%), p < 0.001.

The presence of fat prolapse was significantly higher in the DON group (p = 0.003).

BI at 40% provided best diagnostic performance with sensitivity of 78.3%/specificity of 63.9%.

The presence of fat prolapse 4.5 mm via the superior-ophthalmic-fissure (SOF) had a lower sensitivity compared with fat prolapse 2.5 mm.

Comparison between area under the curve (AUC) of BI and fat prolapse revealed no statistically significant difference (AUC 0.742 and 0.705 in BI and fat prolapse, respectively, p = 0.607).

A negative correlation between the BI and fat prolapse with VA and VF was observed (p < 0.001).

Currently, there are no definite diagnostic criteria for dysthyroid optic neuropathy, but orbital parametric values are useful in detecting it. Some researchers have found orbital muscle volume to be a predictor of the disease, the present study highlighted the importance of employing Barrett's index in identifying DON. A significant difference was found between BI values of patients with and without optic neuropathy. This cohort study revealed the best diagnostic value to be a BI of 40%, which yielded sensitivity/specificity of 78.3%/63.9%.it is important for physicians not to rule out the possibility of DON in patients without muscle enlargement on orbital CT scan or rely solely on employing a larger BI in supporting diagnosis. In fact, BI should be used in conjunction with an ophthalmologist's clinical assessment.

This study highlighted the benefit of measurement of muscle index as a simple diagnostic method. In addition, most appropriate BI in our study was lower than those employed in western studies. Ophthalmologists should suspect DON based on clinical ophthalmic findings in combination with the presence of fat prolapse with or without increase BI on orbital CT scan. Slightly larger BI and the presence of fat prolapse in GO patients without a clinical of DON should be closely monitored as those may have a higher risk of optic neuropathy for early treatment.

Measurement of muscle index (BI) is a simple diagnostic tool for detecting DON in Thai populations using a BI of 40%, yielding a sensitivity 78.3% and a specificity 63.9%. The presence of fat prolapse (2.5 mm) provides a lower sensitivity (52.2%) compared with a BI at 40% in Thai population. Patients with slightly larger muscle size or fat prolapse through SOF should be suspected of dysthyroid optic neuropathy for early treatment.

Source: Kemchoknatee et al; Clinical Ophthalmology 2022:16

https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S364987

Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Ophthalmology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News