Retinal Changes can aid diagnosis of Preclinical Alzheimer Disease- JAMA

Written By :  Dr Ishan Kataria
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-06-01 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-06-01 03:30 GMT
Advertisement

Alzheimer disease is a multifaceted process that progresses along a continuum with a commonly defined starting point being the accumulation of the Amyloid- β (Aβ) and tau proteins, 2 key molecular factors in the AD pathophysiologic patterns. Aβ biomarker accumulation was demonstrated on positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid analysis.

The epidemic of AD has already decreased the life expectancy in the US, adding to the urgency to identify a noninvasive biomarker to easily detect not only those with symptomatic AD, but also those with preclinical AD for whom lifestyle modifications, such as diet, exercise, and cognitive engagement, may delay onset.

Advertisement

The retina holds promise in being able to provide such a biomarker, yet challenges remain, ranging from evolving understanding of underlying AD pathophysiologic characteristics to current limitations of retinal imaging.

As published in JAMA Ophthalmology, Byun and colleagues reported a single-center, cross-sectional study evaluating the association of retinal changes with AD neuroimaging biomarkers in 49 cognitively normal individuals. Participants underwent swept-source optical coherence tomography wherein macular thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness were measured, and multifocal electroretinogram were performed.

PET imaging using the 11 carbon-labeled Pittsburgh compound B ([11C] PiB) ligand to detect Aβ and simultaneous 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed.

The investigators observed delayed implicit time (reduction of 5.2% in ring 3 and 7.5% in ring 5) on multifocal electroretinogram as well as reduced regional thickness of the macula in the inner ring (6.2% thinner) as well as inferior (22.4% thinner) and temporal (21.1% thinner) retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the 16 individuals with Aβ deposition compared with the 33 individuals without Aβ deposition.

The authors also found ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness in the superior and superonasal subfields had a moderate correlation with cortical thickness of the AD signature regions on MRI, including the entorhinal, parahippocampal, middle temporal, angular gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus. There were low correlations with macular thickness and low to moderate correlations with multifocal electroretinogram amplitudes.

Logistic regression analysis was constructed to detect Aβ positivity as the outcome variable that included age, sex, APOE4 status, and vision as fixed variables. Years of education is known to affect the rate of cognitive decline and might also be an important factor to consider in future models.

APOE4 carrier status was noted in 27.3% of the Aβ-negative group compared with 43.8% in the Aβ-positive group. Individuals with APOE4 have a greater risk of developing AD and are more likely to have Aβ accumulation.

In the study, there were more individuals with hypertension (43.8% vs 33.3%) and individuals with diabetes (18.8% vs 6.1%) in the Aβ-positive group. In addition, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, and obesity increase the risk for subsequent clinically diagnosed AD.

Diagnostic biomarkers noted on PET and in cerebrospinal fluid are direct surrogates of brain AD lesions (amyloidosis or tauopathy) and therefore indicative of the presence of the disease, while progression markers identify later changes (eg, neuronal loss) indicative of disease progression but not necessarily specific to AD.

The specificity of retinal findings compared with other diseases causing neurodegeneration, such as diabetes, hypertension, glaucoma, and others, remains a key challenge.

The differential association of neurodegenerative changes with specific regions of the retina also merits further investigation because ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer was similar while inner nasal macular thickness was thinner in Aβpositive individuals. A layer-based analysis might be helpful to determine whether different layers of the retina are differentially affected, in addition to a topographic region–based analysis. Standardization of Aβ positivity to define preclinical AD also remains an unmet need.

Preclinical AD is currently defined using different biomarkers and criteria, and, although more invasive, cerebrospinal fluid–based approaches result in a higher Aβ-positive prevalence than PET-based ones.

Although biomarkers are not yet ready for use in clinical practice, this study provides important data on both structural and functional retinal changes in preclinical AD. Although large, diverse population-based studies are needed to provide further insights into the long preclinical AD prodrome and further elucidate the role of retinal changes, these metrics bring us a step closer in our quest to developing retinal biomarkers in the detection of asymptomatic preclinical AD.

Source: Dilraj S. Grewal, Sharon Fekrat ; JAMA Ophthalmology May 2021 Volume 139, Number 5

doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0319


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Opthalmology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News