Selective laser trabeculectomy has long-term efficacy over eye drops for glaucoma

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-09-25 14:00 GMT   |   Update On 2022-09-25 16:17 GMT
Advertisement

UK: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) can produce greater results than routinely employed IOP-lowering eye drops, according to new findings from an extension of the LiGHT study that was published in the Ophthalmology journal.

Glaucoma is a chronic illness that requires lifelong therapy; the average life expectancy at the time of the initial diagnosis is 9–13 years, and the average life expectancy following trabeculectomy is 7.5 years. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for the treatment of glaucoma in 2001. Since then, SLT has become a more popular option to eye drops that lower IOP, but there hasn't been much research on how effective it is as a stand-alone therapy.

Advertisement

This study compares the clinical efficacy of the initial SLT treatment to IOP-lowering eye drops after 6 years of treatment in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and clinical outcomes.

The initial SLT or eye drops were randomly assigned to patients in this prospective multicenter randomized controlled experiment. International standards served as the foundation for the goal IOP and monitoring intervals for each eye. Those in the SLT arm were offered a third SLT after the first three years of the experiment, if necessary; patients in the drops arm were allowed SLT as a switch or escalation in treatment. Analysis was done with treatment in view. Clinical efficacy and safety were the secondary goals; HRQL at 6 years was the primary outcome. In the LiGHT experiment, 633 patients (91.5%) of the 692 patients who completed the first three years joined the extension phase, while 524 patients (82.8% of those who entered the extension phase and 73% of those who were initially randomized) finished the trial after six years.

Conclusive points of the study:

  • No changes in HRQL between the EQ-5D, GUI, and GQL-15 at 6 years were seen (all p>0.05).
  • With 83.6 (SD 18.1) vs. 81.3 (SD 17.3), the SLT arm outperformed the drops arm in terms of GSS scores.
  • The goal IOP was maintained in 69.8% of the SLT arm's eyes without the requirement for any kind of medical or surgical intervention.
  • Increased disease development was seen in more eyes in the drops group (26.8% vs 19.6%, p=0.006).
  • In the drops arm, there were additional cataract procedures (95 compared to 57 eyes, p=0.03), and 32 eyes in the drops arm required trabeculectomy as opposed to 13 eyes in the SLT group (p<0.001). No significant laser-related side effects were observed.

The researchers came to the conclusion that SLT is a safe and effective treatment for OAG and OHT, offering superior long-term disease control than initial drop therapy, with less need for incisional glaucoma and cataract surgery over 6 years.

However, they do provide a warning given that the majority of the study's participants had moderate instances of glaucoma or ocular hypertension, both of which had far more lenient IOP reduction targets than advanced glaucoma.

REFERENCE

Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Adeleke M, Vickerstaff V, Ambler G, Hunter R, Bunce C, Nathwani N, Barton K; LiGHT Trial Study Group. LiGHT trial: 6-year results of primary selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 2022 Sep 16:S0161-6420(22)00732-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.09.009. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36122660. 


Tags:    
Article Source : Ophthalmology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News