Stereotactic Radiotherapy Reduces Anti-VEGF Use in nAMD Without Affecting Visual Acuity: Study
Researchers have found that stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) reduces the need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections without significantly impacting visual acuity. This randomized trial, reported by Timothy L. Jackson, MBChB, PhD, of King's College Hospital in London, demonstrates that SRT could potentially lower the global treatment burden and costs associated with nAMD. The study was published in The Lancet journal.
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration is a leading cause of vision loss among the elderly. The standard treatment involves intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF medications like ranibizumab (Lucentis). Despite their efficacy, these injections are costly and require frequent administration, which can be burdensome for patients. Previous studies have suggested that radiation therapy might reduce the need for these injections, but the long-term effects and safety of such an approach remained unclear until now.
The study enrolled 411 patients with nAMD, who were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 16-Gy SRT or sham SRT, in addition to their ongoing ranibizumab treatment. Patients were followed for two years, with data from 359 patients analyzed for efficacy and 409 for safety. The primary outcomes measured were the number of anti-VEGF injections required and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse events, particularly microvascular abnormalities.
• Patients assigned to SRT received an average of 10.7 doses of ranibizumab over two years compared to 13.3 doses for those in the sham SRT group.
• This reduction of 2.9 injections per patient (95% CI -4.2 to -1.6, P<0.0001) was statistically significant.
• There was no significant difference in BCVA between the two groups at the end of the trial, with BCVA decreasing by 1.7 letters, meeting the prespecified criteria for noninferiority.
• Adverse events were similar in both groups, but microvascular abnormalities were more common in the SRT group (35%) compared to the sham group (12%).
• Despite this, overall BCVA in eyes with microvascular abnormalities was better than in those without.
The trial results indicate that SRT can effectively reduce the frequency of anti-VEGF injections required for nAMD treatment without compromising visual outcomes. The reduction in injections led to significant cost savings, estimated at £565 (~$725) per patient over two years. This finding is particularly relevant given the high annual costs associated with anti-VEGF therapy, which are estimated at $10.7 billion in the U.S. alone.
These findings suggest that SRT could be a viable adjunctive therapy for nAMD, reducing the need for frequent anti-VEGF injections and associated costs without compromising patient safety or visual outcomes. However, further research is needed to address potential long-term risks, such as geographic atrophy, and to determine the efficacy of SRT in combination with longer-acting anti-VEGF agents.
In conclusion, the study by Jackson and colleagues provides strong evidence that SRT reduces the frequency of anti-VEGF injections needed for nAMD treatment without adversely affecting visual acuity. If further studies confirm these results, SRT could become a key component in the management of nAMD, offering a less burdensome and more cost-effective treatment option for patients worldwide.
Reference:
Jackson, T. L., Desai, R., Wafa, H. A., Wang, Y., Peacock, J., Peto, T., Chakravarthy, U., Dakin, H., Wordsworth, S., Lewis, C., Clinch, P., Ramazzotto, L., Neffendorf, J. E., Lee, C. N., O’Sullivan, J. M., Reeves, B. C., Abugreen, S., Bindra, M., Burton, B., … Vrizidou, E. (2024). Stereotactic radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (STAR): a pivotal, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled device trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00687-1
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.