Topical NSAIDs flop in management of central serous chorioretinopathy

Written By :  Aditi
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-09-30 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-09-30 10:46 GMT

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been proposed to manage central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). According to a systematic review and meta-analysis published in Acta Ophthalmologica, reported evidence does not support the role of topical NSAID for treating CSC. This analysis identified long-term adverse effects of using topical NSAID, including persistent...

Login or Register to read the full article

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been proposed to manage central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). According to a systematic review and meta-analysis published in Acta Ophthalmologica, reported evidence does not support the role of topical NSAID for treating CSC. This analysis identified long-term adverse effects of using topical NSAID, including persistent corneal epithelial defects, delayed corneal epithelial healing, superficial punctate keratitis, corneal infiltrations, and corneal and scleral ulcerations and melts.

CSC is a prevalent exudative maculopathy affecting males primarily aged 30-50 years. Photodynamic therapy, oral aldosterone antagonism and subthreshold multifocal laser are the recommended therapeutic approaches. The ongoing shortage of verteporfin restricts current therapeutic possibilities. Topical NSAIDs have previously been proposed as a treatment for CSC, but there needs to be more research on its exact efficacy.

Janni M. E. Larsson and colleagues investigated this background and searched 11 literature databases for a study describing topical NSAID for CSC management. The team found thirteen eligible studies (six case reports, two cohort studies and five non-randomized comparative studies), including 1001 eyes of 994 patients with CSC.

The study summary highlights the following considerations:

  • There were 899 CSC patients: 381 received topical NSAID, and 518 received no treatment.
  • Bromfenac 0.09%, diclofenac 0.1%, ketorolac 0.4% and 0.5%, pranoprofen 0.1%, and nepafenac 0.1% and 0.3%. were the topical NSAIDs used.
  • Acute CSC cases were predominant.
  • Many case studies reported treatment outcomes simultaneously with corticosteroid use discontinuation, which complicated the treatment evaluation.
  • The change in best-corrected visual acuity improvement or BCVA improved slightly in NSAID-treated patients at the 1-month follow-up –0.04 logMAR. However, this change was insignificant at the 3-month follow-up –0.03 logMAR.
  • The team reported no benefit in complete subretinal fluid resolution at 1-month or 3-month follow-up with OR: 1.20 and 1.17, respectively.

They said, “Based on our study findings, available evidence does not support topical NSAIDs usage for CSC management.”

Reference:

Larsson JME et al. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 8. doi: 10.1111/aos.15743.


Tags:    
Article Source : Acta Ophthalmologica

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News