Topical NSAIDs flop in management of central serous chorioretinopathy

Written By :  Aditi
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-09-30 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-09-30 10:46 GMT
Advertisement

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been proposed to manage central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). According to a systematic review and meta-analysis published in Acta Ophthalmologica, reported evidence does not support the role of topical NSAID for treating CSC. This analysis identified long-term adverse effects of using topical NSAID, including persistent corneal epithelial defects, delayed corneal epithelial healing, superficial punctate keratitis, corneal infiltrations, and corneal and scleral ulcerations and melts.

Advertisement

CSC is a prevalent exudative maculopathy affecting males primarily aged 30-50 years. Photodynamic therapy, oral aldosterone antagonism and subthreshold multifocal laser are the recommended therapeutic approaches. The ongoing shortage of verteporfin restricts current therapeutic possibilities. Topical NSAIDs have previously been proposed as a treatment for CSC, but there needs to be more research on its exact efficacy.

Janni M. E. Larsson and colleagues investigated this background and searched 11 literature databases for a study describing topical NSAID for CSC management. The team found thirteen eligible studies (six case reports, two cohort studies and five non-randomized comparative studies), including 1001 eyes of 994 patients with CSC.

The study summary highlights the following considerations:

  • There were 899 CSC patients: 381 received topical NSAID, and 518 received no treatment.
  • Bromfenac 0.09%, diclofenac 0.1%, ketorolac 0.4% and 0.5%, pranoprofen 0.1%, and nepafenac 0.1% and 0.3%. were the topical NSAIDs used.
  • Acute CSC cases were predominant.
  • Many case studies reported treatment outcomes simultaneously with corticosteroid use discontinuation, which complicated the treatment evaluation.
  • The change in best-corrected visual acuity improvement or BCVA improved slightly in NSAID-treated patients at the 1-month follow-up –0.04 logMAR. However, this change was insignificant at the 3-month follow-up –0.03 logMAR.
  • The team reported no benefit in complete subretinal fluid resolution at 1-month or 3-month follow-up with OR: 1.20 and 1.17, respectively.

They said, “Based on our study findings, available evidence does not support topical NSAIDs usage for CSC management.”

Reference:

Larsson JME et al. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 8. doi: 10.1111/aos.15743.


Tags:    
Article Source : Acta Ophthalmologica

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News