Treatment with ranibizumab in aflibercept inadequate AMD responders led to visual acuity improvement: The "ELEVATE" Study

Written By :  Dr Ishan Kataria
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-12-08 04:45 GMT   |   Update On 2022-12-08 10:59 GMT
Advertisement

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive, degenerative disease of the retina, and a leading cause of vision loss worldwide. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of CNV. As a result, the introduction of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of wAMD has drastically altered the standard of care in retinal medicine, substantially lowering the rates of legal blindness and visual impairment. Four anti-VEGF agents have been evaluated for the treatment of wAMD: pegaptanib, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept, of which ranibizumab and aflibercept are those most commonly used in routine care.

Advertisement

Rouvas et al carried a non-interventional, prospective study mainly aimed to provide real-world data on the six month effects of ranibizumab on anatomical and visual acuity outcomes in eyes with active neovascular AMD, that were previously treated with aflibercept and showed inadequate response, in a representative sample of patients treated in the routine care of Greece.Prospective, observational study performed in eight ophthalmology hospital/private clinics in Greece, enrolling consented patients with active wAMD, ≥50 years-old, who had initiated ranibizumab ≥28 days and < 2 months after their last aflibercept injection. Data were collected at enrollment, and at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment onset (post-baseline).

Between September-2015 and November-2017, 103 eligible patients were consecutively enrolled. The age at AMD diagnosis in the study eye was 71.3±8.8 years.

Aflibercept (median of 5 injections received over 11.3 months) had been discontinued for anatomical (in 69.9%) and/or functional (38.8%) reasons.

At baseline (median: 24.3 months after wAMD diagnosis), choroidal neovascularization was occult in 69.1% of evaluable study eyes; 60.2% of the study eyes had pigment epithelial detachment (PED); 42.7% cysts; 21.4% fibrosis; 66.0% subretinal, and 59.2% intraretinal fluid.

At 6 months post-baseline: a median of 3 ranibizumab injections (range: 1–6) had been received; the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)≥0 letter gain rate was 81.8%; the BCVA ≥15 letter gain rate was 17.0%; BCVA gain was 3.2 letters [mean increase: 3.2±10.0 letters; median: 0.0; p = 0.002]; PED greatest basal diameter (GBD; median: 1470.5 μm) also decreased (median decrease: 114.0 μm; p = 0.019). Baseline central retinal thickness (CRT; median: 312.0 μm) remained unchanged.

One patient permanently discontinued ranibizumab due to adverse event occurrence, assessed as not causally related to ranibizumab. There were no ranibizumab-related adverse reactions.

The study indicates that ranibizumab improves visual acuity and certain anatomic outcomes after only 6 months of treatment, even when fewer than the recommended injections are administered. Additionally, physicians ranked the ease of administration of ranibizumab as better (58%) or the same (39%) as that of aflibercept in the vast majority of the patients.

Regarding anatomic outcomes, CRT remained stable throughout the observation period, whereas a statistically significant mean decrease of 46.5 μm in PED height from baseline to 6 months (using LOCF imputation) was noted (matching the 46-μm mean change assumed for sample size estimation), while significant mean decreases were also observed in PED GBD of 114.0 μm based on as-observed data and of 143.0 μm using LOCF imputation.

Overall, the study demonstrated that in the routine care of Greece, patients with wAMD receive fewer ranibizumab injections than those that would be administered under the approved dosage schedule. Under these conditions, after approximately 6 months of treatment, the patients' visual acuity improved, modest improvements in PED dimensions were noted, and CRT remained stable Further real-world evidence is needed from studies more closely matching the approved dosage scheme, in order to identify predictors of early response, aiming to enhance outcomes in patients with wAMD who have inadequately responded to prior aflibercept treatment and to further delay the progression of the disease.

Source: Rouvas et al; Clinical Ophthalmology 2022:16

Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Ophthalmology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News