Direct decompression may rapidly resolve radiculopathy symptoms compared to indirect Single Level Lumbar Fusion: study
Single level fusion with direct decompression is a well accepted treatment in addressing lumbar radiculopathy, yet studies have found that patients undergoing fusion with direct decompression have similar outcomes to those receiving direct decompression alone. Indirect decompression is an increasingly common alternative in the treatment of radiculopathy and may represent reduced risk as compared with direct decompression, since indirect decompression does not involve resection of compressing tissue, though there is a general paucity of literature comparing outcomes following indirect decompression with other interventions.
Walia et al conducted a study to compare and evaluate symptom relief in patients experiencing radiculopathy undergoing lumbar fusion with indirect or direct decompression techniques. Specifically, they examined clinical symptoms of radiculopathy, pain, and motor scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively for patients undergoing surgical single-level direct or indirect decompression.
Patients ≥18 years of age with preoperative radiculopathy undergoing single-level lumbar fusion with up to 2-year follow-up were grouped by indirect and direct decompression. Direct decompression (DD) group included anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior DD procedure as well as all transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Indirect decompression (ID) group included ALIF and LLIF without posterior DD procedure. Propensity score matching was used to control for intergroup differences in age. Intergroup outcomes were compared using means comparison tests. Logistic regressions were used to correlate decompression type with symptom resolution over time. Significance set at P < .05.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.