Early weight-bearing effective for recovery and cost in ankle fracture patients: Study

Written By :  Jacinthlyn Sylvia
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-08-05 14:45 GMT   |   Update On 2024-08-05 14:45 GMT
Advertisement

A new study published in The Lancet journal found an early weight-bearing method to be both extremely likely to be cost-effective and clinically non-inferior to the present standard of treatment (delayed weight-bearing).

The patients with fractured ankles are often told not to walk for 6 weeks following surgery (delayed weight-bearing). Early weight-bearing (walking) two weeks post-surgery may be a safer and better rehabilitation approach. In order to examine the clinical and financial efficacy of an early weight-bearing method vs a delayed weight-bearing strategy, Christopher Patrick Bretherton and colleagues undertook this study.

Advertisement

This pragmatic, randomised, multicenter, non-inferiority trial included 561 participants (over 18 years) who underwent acute surgery in 23 NHS hospitals in the UK for an unstable ankle fracture. The participants were randomly assigned to an early weight-bearing rehabilitation strategy (n = 281) or a delayed weight-bearing rehabilitation strategy (n = 280). Excluded patients were those receiving treatment for a hindfoot nail, those without protective ankle feeling (such as peripheral neuropathy), those incapable of giving informed permission, and those unable to follow study protocols. The therapy was not concealed from either the subjects or the doctors. The Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), which measures ankle function in the per-protocol population 4 months after randomization, was the main outcome. The intention-to-treat population underwent superiority testing in the event of non-inferiority, and the pre-specified non-inferiority OMAS margin was –6 points.

Of the 561 individuals, 480 (86%) had primary outcome data collected with the hiring period running between January 13, 2020 and October 29, 2021. 4 months post-randomization, the mean OMAS score of early weight-bearing group was 65·9, while the delayed weight-bearing group's was 61·2. The adjusted mean difference was 4·47, favoring the early weight-bearing group. One or more problems were experienced by 46 (16%) individuals in the early weight-bearing group and 39 (14%) participants in the delayed weight-bearing group.

In the early and delayed weight-bearing groups, the mean costs to the NHS and personal social services were £725 and £785, respectively. Also, more than 80% of people believed that early weight-bearing was cost-effective. Overall, this study found that an early weight-bearing technique is not inferior to delayed weight-bearing following ankle fracture repair and is very likely to be cost-effective.

Reference: 

Bretherton, C. P., Achten, J., Jogarah, V., Petrou, S., Peckham, N., Achana, F., Appelbe, D., Kearney, R., Claireux, H., Bell, P., Griffin, X. L., McAndrew, A., Jacobs, N., Forder, J., Hester, T., Cross, C., Bateman, T., Kieffer, W., Barton, T., … White, T. (2024). Early versus delayed weight-bearing following operatively treated ankle fracture (WAX): a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. In The Lancet (Vol. 403, Issue 10446, pp. 2787–2797). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00710-4

Tags:    
Article Source : The Lancet

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News