The authors conducted a retrospective examination of the medical records of 250 patients who had undergone ligament reconstruction using the Endobutton device. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify the risk factors. Subsequently, a nomogram model was constructed to forecast the probability of reduction loss. The model’s discrimination and calibration were assessed using a calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic, and decision plot. To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients experiencing reduction loss, both the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Constant score were assessed both preoperatively and at the final follow-up.
The key findings of the study were:
• Reduction loss occurred in 25.6% (64/250) of enrolled patients during the study period.
• In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for postoperative reduction loss were identified, including the conoid tunnel ratio (P = 0.002), trapezoid tunnel ratio (P = 0.009), coracoid button position (P < 0.001), additional pin fixation (P < 0.001), and weight-bearing time (P < 0.001).
• The contour map demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 0.896 in assessing the risk of reduction loss.
• Patients with displacement exceeding 100% of the thickness of the distal clavicle exhibited significantly worse results at the final follow-up in terms of the VAS score (P < 0.001), Constant score (P < 0.001), and subjective outcomes (P < 0.001).
The authors opined – “In conclusion, patients with displacement greater than 100% of the thickness of the distal clavicle had poorer postoperative clinical outcomes. Further surgical intervention may be needed for this group of patients. For patients with less than or equal to 100% displacement of the thickness of the distal clavicle, no special treatment was required. We found a correlation between reduction loss and tunnel malposition, no additional pin fixation and premature weight-bearing of the affected limb (< 5 weeks). Our nomogram helped to identify high-risk patients and provide them with close follow-up and even surgical intervention to reduce the rate of reduction loss. It also provided us with guidance on surgical treatment for such injuries in the future.”
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.