Intraarticular structural bone grafting maintains column height in atlantoaxial facet joints

Written By :  Dr. Nandita Mohan
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-08-26 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-08-26 03:30 GMT

Intraarticular structural bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints has the advantage of maintaining anterior column height in the case of lateral mass collapse, reports a study recently published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. Jun Zhu and colleagues from the Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University,...

Login or Register to read the full article

Intraarticular structural bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints has the advantage of maintaining anterior column height in the case of lateral mass collapse, reports a study recently published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

Jun Zhu and colleagues from the Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, China investigated the necessity of nonstructural or structural intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach and the influence by the presence of basilar invagination (BI).

The authors reviewed patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial or occipitocervical arthrodesis surgery at one institute. Operation records, preoperative and postoperative clinical status, and radiological films were analyzed.

Thirty-three patients (19 without BI, 14 with BI) underwent posterior facet joint release followed by intraarticular bone grafting were enrolled finally. Twenty-four nonstructural (15 without BI, 9 with BI) and 9 structural (4 without BI, 5 with BI) grafting were performed. The average follow-up was 32.15±6.73 months (24–47 months).

Among them, 1 (3.03%) implant failure occurred, and 32 (96.97%) achieved satisfactory neurological outcomes, including 28 (84.85%) complete and 4 (12.12%) acceptable reductions with complete fusion within 6 months.

For patients without basilar invagination, structural and nonstructural grafting showed no significant difference in terms of reduction maintenance (100% vs 73.33%, p = 0.530), while for those with basilar invagination, structural grafting significantly increased the postoperative height of the joint space (5.67±1.22 mm vs 3.43±1.78 mm, p = 0.002) and maintained it much better than nonstructural grafting (88.89% vs 20.00%, p = 0.023), contributing notably to basilar invagination correction.

Therefore, it was concluded that intraarticular structural bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints has the advantage of maintaining anterior column height in the case of lateral mass collapse or when basilar invagination correction is needed; otherwise, nonstructural bone grafting is enough.

Zhu, J., Wu, J., Luo, K. et al. Intraarticular bone grafting in atlantoaxial facet joints via a posterior approach: nonstructural or structural—a minimum 24-month follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 524 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02630-z


Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News