Removable brace effective alternative to traditional plaster cast for patients with ankle fracture

Written By :  Dr Supreeth D R
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-05-08 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-05-09 09:29 GMT
Advertisement

A. Haque et al conducted a study to compare the longer-term outcomes of operatively and non operatively managed patients treated with a removable brace (fixed-angle removable orthosis) or a plaster cast immobilization for an acute ankle fracture. The study was conducted at ‘Warwick University, Coventry, UK’ and published in “THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL.”

This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing adults with an acute ankle fracture, initially managed either by operative or nonoperative care. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a cast immobilization or a fixed-angle removable orthosis (removable brace). Data were collected on baseline characteristics, ankle function, quality of life, and complications. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was the primary outcome which was used to measure the participant’s ankle function. The primary endpoint was at 16 weeks, with longer-term follow-up at 24 weeks and two years.

Advertisement

Key findings of the study were:

• Overall, 436 patients (65%) completed the final two-year follow-up.

• 216 remained in the cast group and 220 patients in the brace group.

• The mean difference in OMAS at two years was -0.3 points favouring the plaster cast (95% confidence interval -3.9 to 3.4), indicating no statistically significant difference between the interventions.

• There was no evidence of differences in patient quality of life (measured using the EuroQol five dimension five-level questionnaire) or Disability Rating Index.

The authors concluded that – “This study demonstrated that patients treated with a removable brace had similar outcomes to those treated with a plaster cast in the first two years after injury. A removable brace is an effective alternative to traditional immobilization in a plaster cast for patients with an ankle fracture.”

Take home message stated by the authors was – “ A removable brace is as effective as traditional immobilization in a plaster cast for patients with an ankle fracture. This applies long-term to patients treated both operatively and nonoperatively.”

Further reading:

Use of cast immobilization versus removable brace in adults with an ankle fracture: two year follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial, A. Haque, H. Parsons et al, THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(4):382–388.

Tags:    
Article Source : THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News