Short nails in subtrochanteric hip fractures tied to higher rates of implant failure and peri-implant fractures: study
Subtrochanteric hip fractures present a treatment challenge due to their varied etiologies, complexity, and associated complications. While intramedullary nailing is the standard treatment, the choice between short and long nails remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the complication rates of short versus long cephalomedullary nail fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric hip fractures.
Amr Selim et al conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant studies. Inclusion criteria comprised studies directly comparing short and long nails in treating subtrochanteric fractures, including randomized controlled trials and comparative studies. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan 5.23.5 software.
The key findings of the study were:
• After screening, 5 retrospective comparative studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 4,384 subtrochanteric fracture subjects. The weighted mean age was 82 years, with women representing 70.7% of the sample. Implant failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.15-3.92]; p = 0.02) and peri-implant fractures (OR 4.03; 95% CI [1.46-11.14]; p = 0.007) were significantly more common with short nails.
• The reoperation rate was higher with short nails but not statistically significant (OR 1.33; 95% CI [0.87-2.04]; p = 0.19).
• No significant differences were observed between groups for nonunion (OR 0.96; 95% CI [0.40-2.33]; p = 0.94), deep infection (OR 0.70; 95% CI [0.232.17]; p = 0.40), or 1-year mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI [0.43-1.58]; p = 0.57).
The authors concluded – “The use of short nails in the management of subtrochanteric hip fractures is associated with higher rates of implant failure and peri-implant fractures, with equivalent rates of nonunion, infection, 1-year mortality, and reoperation. These findings highlight the need for a well-conducted trial to assess the overall benefits and to determine the lowest level of subtrochanteric fracture that can be safely treated with short nails.”
Level of Evidence: Level III.
Further reading:
Short Versus Long Nails in Treating Subtrochanteric Hip Fractures
Amr Selim et al
JBJS Open Access 2025:e25.00144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00144
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.