Automated impaction in primary THA safe technique for femoral preparation resulting in consistent stem coronal alignment
While automated impaction can provide a more standardized process for femoral canal preparation, little is known regarding its effect on femoral component sizing and position.
Hope S. Thalody et al conducted a study to directly compare femoral component canal fill ratio (CFR) and coronal alignment between primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures performed with automated impaction versus manual mallet impaction.
A retrospective analysis was performed on 184 patients who underwent primary THA by a single arthroplasty surgeon with a modern cementless femoral component using either the direct anterior or posterolateral approach. The final cohort was divided into 2 groups based on impaction technique during broaching: automated (N = 122) or manual (N = 62). A propensity score match was used to match for age, body mass index, sex, high versus standard offset stem, and preoperative femoral bone quality. Radiographic review was performed to measure intramedullary prosthetic CFR and coronal alignment.
Key findings of the study were:
• The automated cohort trended toward the use of a larger stem (5.67 versus 4.82, P = .006) and had a larger CFR at all 4 levels within the proximal femur (P = .004).
• The automated cohort had a more valgus and reliable coronal alignment (-0.57 (SD 1.50) versus -0.03 (SD 2.17) degrees, P = .03) and significantly shorter operative time (mean 78 versus 90 minutes, P < .001).
• There were no intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fractures in either cohort.
The authors concluded that - “Automated impaction in primary THA is a safe technique for femoral preparation which resulted in consistent stem coronal alignment, optimized canal fill within the proximal femur, and reduced operative times without increasing the risk of peri prosthetic fractures compared to manual broaching. The authors feel that automated impaction is a safe and effective technology for improving operating room efficiency and optimizing preparation of the femur.”
Further reading:
Does Automated Impaction Improve Femoral Component Sizing and Alignment in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Hope S. Thalody, Zachary D. Post et al
The Journal of Arthroplasty 2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.054
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.