Over 9 crore insured under RGJAY, only 11 lakh claims received

Published On 2018-03-31 03:39 GMT   |   Update On 2018-03-31 03:39 GMT
Advertisement
Mumbai: Over nine crore people in Maharashtra were insured for medical treatment under the Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana (RGJAY) during 2011-17, but only a fraction of this number filed claims, the CAG has said.

Lack of publicity was one of the reasons for this lackluster response, the Comptroller and Auditor General said in its report tabled before the state legislature yesterday.

Advertisement


An audit of the RGJAY revealed that the government failed to obtain details such as name and card number of ration card holders who were intended beneficiaries, it said.

"Therefore, the authenticity of beneficiaries...could not be verified. The health cards to beneficiaries envisaged under the scheme...were not distributed,"the report stated.

"Against the premium of Rs 3,009.31 crore paid to the insurer company until November 2016, covering 9.35 crore beneficiaries, the claims received for settlement were from a meagre 11.89 lakh persons due to absence of wide publicity to the scheme...and non-appointment of Arogyamitras (who are supposed to make people aware of such schemes) at Primary Health Centres," it stated.

The Maharashtra government introduced the RGJAY in 2011 to provide affordable medical treatment to families in Below Poverty Line category, or whose income is less than Rs 1 lakh.

The scheme covers around 971 medical procedures and 121 follow-up packages.

An audit of upgradation of government medical colleges (GMCs) at Mumbai and Nagpur revealed that no "gap analysis" of existing facilities and future requirements in tertiary care for the purpose of PMSSY was carried out, the CAG said.

"The upgradation programme of GMCs could not be implemented as per the plan and there were instances of enormous delays, non-execution of civil works and non-procurement as well as non-installation of equipment for want of space," the CAG stated.

Violation of contract conditions resulted in equipment suppliers getting undue benefits, it said.
Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News