Crigler lacrimal sac massage may improve resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in young kids: Study

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-10-02 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-10-03 06:50 GMT

Crigler lacrimal sac massage may improve the resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in young kids suggests a study published in the Paediatric ophthalmology.

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is the most common cause of epiphora and mucous discharge in the newborn. We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled trial to determine whether Crigler massage promotes the resolution of CNLDO in infants under 1 year of age.

A total of 102 infants aged 3–11 months with unilateral CNLDO were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the massage and non-massage groups (n=51/group). As an allocation adjustment factor, the patients were divided into age groups of 3–5, 6–8 and 9–11 months. In the massage group, the guardian performed 10 strokes two times per day for each day until resolution or 1 month.

The primary endpoint was a comparison of the 1-month resolution rate in the massage and non-massage groups. Results: This study included 49 male and 53 female patients with a mean age of 6.4±2.4 months. Overall, in this study, the resolution rate was not significantly different between the massage and non-massage groups (31.4% and 33.3%, respectively).

However, the resolution rate was higher in the massage group in the 3–5 months age group among the protocol-compliant patients after excluding those with insufficient massage frequency (the massage group, 68.8% and the non-massage group, 28.6%, p=0.022). There was no increase in the resolution rate after 1 month of lacrimal sac massage in patients 3–11 months old with unilateral CNLDO. However, in protocol-compliant younger age groups, Crigler massage may be effective.

Reference

Asano M, Takeuchi M, Ohno T, et alLacrimal sac massage for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a multicentre randomised controlled trialBritish Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;108:1281-1285.

Tags:    
Article Source : Paediatric ophthalmology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News