Dexmedetomidine non-inferior to midazolam for sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Study

Written By :  Dr. Nandita Mohan
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-03-02 05:15 GMT   |   Update On 2021-03-02 07:09 GMT
Advertisement

According to recent research, it has been found out that there is a non-inferiority of dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam for sedation in children on mechanical ventilation, as published in the Indian Pediatrics Journal.

In children, dexmedetomidine has been reported to be an effective sedative agent without much side effects compared to benzodiazepines or opioids with the additional advantage of reducing the dose of conventional sedative agents. Though use of dexmedetomidine in mechanically ventilated children has increased over last few years, there is wide variation in practice regarding the dose and duration of the drug.

Advertisement

However, few trials that exist, evaluating the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent in mechanically ventilated children, have several limitations. Hence, Krishna Mohan Gulla and colleagues from the Division of Pediatric Pulmonology and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India conducted this noninferiority trial with an objective to compare dexmedetomidine with midazolam for adequacy of sedation in mechanically ventilated children aged 1 month - 15 years.

Secondary objectives were to compare the need for top-up doses of fentanyl and paralytic agents, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay, and adverse events

The authors conducted an open label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial among 49 children who were randomized into two groups: 24 to 'midazolam group' and 25 to 'dexmedetomidine group' and the doses were titrated to maintain target sedation score of 4 or 5 as measured by Penn State Children Hospital Sedation algorithm.

The following findings were noted-

  1. There was no difference in the percentage of time spent in the targeted sedation between the groups [midazolam 67.3% (18.8) vs. dexmedetomidine 56.3 %. (28.6); P=0.12].
  2. The absolute difference in the percentage of time spent was -10.9% [SE (95% CI) 7.05: (-25.15 to 3.25)].
  3. The lower end of 95% CI for the difference breached the non-inferiority limit of -20%.
  4. Number of fentanyl boluses, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay were similar.
  5. Four (17.4%) children in dexmedetomidine group developed persistent bradycardia.

Therefore, the authors concluded that "Non-inferiority of dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam for sedation in children on mechanical ventilation could not be established."


Tags:    
Article Source : Indian Pediatrics Journal

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News