Hypnotherapy effective in reducing symptoms in kids with functional nausea: Study

Written By :  MD Editorial Team
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-11-12 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-11-12 03:30 GMT

Chronic nausea is an increasingly acknowledged complaint in children. It is commonly encountered in association with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. The potential effectiveness of gut-directed hypnotherapy (HT) is unknown for pediatric chronic nausea and its management is required.A randomized controlled trial by Pamela D. Browne and team did a comparative study of hypnotherapy...

Login or Register to read the full article

Chronic nausea is an increasingly acknowledged complaint in children. It is commonly encountered in association with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. The potential effectiveness of gut-directed hypnotherapy (HT) is unknown for pediatric chronic nausea and its management is required.

A randomized controlled trial by Pamela D. Browne and team did a comparative study of hypnotherapy with standard medical treatment (SMT) and revealed that hypnotherapy and SMT were effective in reducing nausea symptoms in children with functional nausea (FN) and functional dyspepsia (FD). In children with functional nausea, hypnotherapy was more effective than SMT during and after the first 6 months of treatment.

The findings of the study is published in Clinical Gasteroenterology and Hepatology journal.

The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of HT with standard medical treatment (SMT).

The study included 100 children (8–18 years) with chronic nausea and fulfilling functional nausea (FN) or functional dyspepsia (FD) criteria were randomly allocated (1:1) to HT or SMT, with a 3-month intervention period. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, half-way and after treatment, and 6- and 12-month follow-up. Children scored nausea symptoms on a 7-day-diary. Primary outcome was treatment success, defined as ≥50% nausea reduction, at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcome included adequate relief of nausea.

The results of the study were

• After treatment and at 6-month follow-up, there was a trend toward higher treatment success in the HT group compared to the SMT group (45% vs. 26%, p = .052 and 57% vs. 40%, p =.099).

• At 12 months, treatment success was similar in both groups (60% (HT) and 55% (SMT); p = .667).

• In the FN group, significant higher success rates were found for HT, but no differences were found in patients with FD.

• Adequate relief was significantly higher in the HT-group than in the SMT-group at 6-month follow-up (children: 81% vs. 55%, p =.014 and parents: 79% vs. 53%, p =.016), but not at 12-month follow-up.

Browne and team concluded that "HT and SMT were effective in reducing nausea symptoms in children with FN and FD. In children with FN, HT was more effective than SMT during and after the first 6 months of treatment. Therefore, HT and SMT, applied separately or in combination, should be offered to children with functional nausea as a treatment option"

Reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.029

Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Gasteroenterology and Hepatology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News