Long Peripheral Catheters first-line device for for Multiday IV Therapy in kids: Study

Written By :  MD Bureau
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-01-31 13:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-01-31 13:35 GMT
Advertisement

Establishment of functioning peripheral intravenous (IV) access is a vital step to provide care in the emergency and inpatient settings. A recent study suggests that Long Peripheral Catheters (LPCs) reduces catheter failure and total catheters in children and recommend the use of LPCs as the first-line device for peripheral access. The study findings were published in the journal PEDIATRICS on January 14, 2021.

Advertisement

Patients with a medical history of obesity, IV drug abuse (IVDA), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and/or sickle cell disease have been shown to have Difficult Vascular Access (DVA) using the traditional technique. Once cannulated, the survival time of IV catheters is problematic, with early failure a common complication. In children, intravenous therapy (IVT) is generally administered via peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) (2–6 cm in length). However, a previous study suggests that PIVCs are unreliable after 2 days. Long peripheral catheters (LPCs) (6–15 cm in length) could improve the delivery of IVT, but the data available are limited. Therefore, researchers of Melbourne, Australia, conducted a study to determine if LPCs could decrease catheter failure and the number of catheters in children receiving multiday IVT.

It was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at Monash Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Researchers included 72 participants of age1 to 17 years, undergoing surgery and requiring >48 hours of postoperative IVT. They randomly assigned them to receive either 2.5-cm 22G PIVCs (n=36) or 8-cm 22G LPCs (n=36).

Key findings of the study were:

• Upon analysis, researchers have found a similar median duration of IVT of 5.1 days between the groups.

• They also found that the catheter failure was higher for PIVCs than LPCs (66.7% vs 19.4% or 187.9 vs 41.0 failures per 1000 catheter-days).

• They noted that the infiltration was the most common reason for PIVC failure (33.3% vs 2.8%).

• They found that LPCs exhibited superior life span (4.7 vs 3.5 days) and children with LPCs were twice as likely to complete therapy with a single catheter (80.6% vs 38.9%).

The authors concluded, "LPCs reduce catheter failure and total catheters in children. They should be considered as the first-line device for peripheral access in any child receiving prolonged IVT".

For further information:

https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/01/13/peds.2020-000877


Tags:    
Article Source :   PEDIATRICS

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News