Procalcitonin guided algorithm not effective in reducing intravenous antibiotic duration among kids: Study

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-01-19 20:15 GMT   |   Update On 2025-01-19 20:15 GMT

A procalcitonin-guided algorithm does not reduce the length of intravenous antibiotic treatment significantly in children suspected of having a bacterial infection as compared to routine care as reported from a recent study from The Lancet: Child & Adolescent Health. This study was conducted by Cherry A. and colleagues in United Kingdom

Duration and safety of antibiotics are important considerations in the treatment of hospitalised children suffering from bacterial infections. C-reactive protein is used widely in the UK National Health Service as a biomarker of bacterial infection. However, the more specific biomarker for bacterial infections, procalcitonin, is not used on a routine basis. The aim of the BATCH trial was to see whether an addition of procalcitonin-guided management would safely shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy.

The BATCH trial was a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial conducted from June 2018 to October 2022 in 15 hospitals in England and Wales. Participants included children from 72 hours of age up to 18 years of age admitted for suspected or confirmed bacterial infections who were required to have intravenous antibiotics for at least 48 hours. Participants (n=1949) were randomly assigned 1:1 to either a standard clinical care group (usual care group, n=972) or a procalcitonin-guided algorithm group (procalcitonin group, n=977). Minimization was used at randomization to adjust for site and age group (0–6 months, 6 months–2 years, 2–5 years, and >5 years). The coprimary outcomes studied were intravenous antibiotic use days and a composite safety endpoint.

Results

  • Of the 15,282 children screened, 1949 were enrolled, of whom 977 were assigned to the procalcitonin group and 972 to the usual care group.

  • The median duration was 96.0 hours (IQR 59.5–155.5) in the procalcitonin group and 99.7 hours (IQR 61.2–153.8) in the usual care group.

  • The hazard ratio for the comparison of the two groups for antibiotic duration was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87–1.05).

  • In the procalcitonin group, 78 of 917 participants (9%) had events included in the composite safety outcome measure.

  • Likewise, 85 of 904 participants (9%) in the usual care group had such events.

  • The adjusted risk difference was –0.81% (95% CI upper bound: 1.11), thus meeting the predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%.

The BATCH trial concluded that a procalcitonin-guided algorithm neither significantly reduces the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy nor offers safety advantages over usual care in hospitalized children with suspected bacterial infections. These findings highlight the efficacy of existing pediatric antibiotic stewardship programs in ensuring optimal treatment outcomes.

Reference:

Waldron, C.-A., Pallmann, P., Schoenbuchner, S., Harris, D., Brookes-Howell, L., Mateus, C., Bernatoniene, J., Cathie, K., Faust, S. N., Hinds, L., Hood, K., Huang, C., Jones, S., Kotecha, S., Nabwera, H. M., Patel, S., Paulus, S. C., Powell, C. V. E., Preston, J., … Rojas-Jimenz, E. (2025). Procalcitonin-guided duration of antibiotic treatment in children hospitalised with confirmed or suspected bacterial infection in the UK (BATCH): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, individually randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(24)00306-

Tags:    
Article Source : The Lancet: Child & Adolescent Health

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News