AI model may improve pulmonary nodule detection on chest radiograph: JAMA

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-02-03 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-02-03 08:10 GMT
Advertisement

Korea: A group of researchers from Korea has developed an AI (artificial intelligence) model that could help radiologists with pulmonary nodule detection on chest radiographs.

The decision analytical modeling study, published in JAMA Network Open, found that DLBS (deep learning–based synthetic bone-suppressed) model was more sensitive to pulmonary nodule detection on chest radiographs than the original model. The model helped radiologists reach sensitivities of 92% for detecting lung nodules.

Advertisement

Dual-energy chest radiography is a technique for improving diagnostic accuracy in chest imaging by separating soft tissues from bones during a single x-ray exposure, thus enhancing the visualization of underlying and overlying anatomy. The technique, however, requires increasing radiation exposure to patients and specialized equipment.

In their previous work, Hwiyoung Kim from Yonsei University College of Medicine in Seoul in, Korea, and colleagues developed a deep-learning model to identify high-quality bone- and soft tissue-only images through standard equipment. In the study, the team aimed to further improve the model by adding a bone-suppression algorithm and then the radiologists' tested its use.

The researchers used data from 3 centres between 2015 and 2019 from 1449 patients. The DLBS nodule-detection algorithm was trained using single-centre data from 998 chest radiographs (institute 1). Validation was done using two external data sets (institute 3, 205 patients; and institute 2, 246 patients).

A comparison was made between the nodule-detection performance of the DLBS model and the convolution neural network nodule-detection algorithm (original model). Three thoracic radiologists assisted by the DLBS algorithm or not tested the performance testing. False-positive markings per image (FPPI) and sensitivity were compared.

The study led to the following findings:

  • Training data consisted of 998 patients (54.0% were men; mean age, 54.2 years), and two external validation data sets consisted of 246 patients (54.1% were men; mean age, 55.3 years) and 205 patients (151.2% were men; mean age, 51.8 years).
  • The bone-suppressed model revealed higher sensitivity than the original model for nodule detection (91.5% vs 79.8%) using the external validation data set of institute 2.
  • There was a reduction in the overall mean of FPPI with the bone-suppressed model compared with the original model (0.07 vs 0.09).
  • For the observer performance testing with the data of institute 3, the mean sensitivity of 3 radiologists was 77.5%, whereas that of radiologists assisted by DLBS modeling was 92.1%.
  • When assisted by the DLBS model, the three radiologists had a reduced number of FPPI (0.071 vs 0.151).

"Our findings indicate that the DLBS model could benefit radiologists in the lung nodules detection in chest radiographs without the need for specialized equipment or an increase of radiation dose," the team concluded.

Reference:

Kim H, Lee KH, Han K, et al. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning–Based Synthetic Bone-Suppressed Model for Pulmonary Nodule Detection in Chest Radiographs. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(1):e2253820. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53820

Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Network Open

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News