Clofazimine effective alternative to rifampicin for treating Mycobacterium avium lung disease: Study

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-12-13 04:45 GMT   |   Update On 2023-12-13 05:35 GMT

Netherlands: Findings from a randomized trial showed clofazimine to be a safe and effective alternative to rifampicin for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD).Retrospective studies have suggested clofazimine as an alternative to rifampicin in MAC-PD treatment. Sanne M.H. Zweijpfenning, Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands,...

Login or Register to read the full article

Netherlands: Findings from a randomized trial showed clofazimine to be a safe and effective alternative to rifampicin for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD).

Retrospective studies have suggested clofazimine as an alternative to rifampicin in MAC-PD treatment. Sanne M.H. Zweijpfenning, Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and colleagues sought to determine if a treatment regimen consisting of clofazimine-ethambutol-macrolide non-inferior to the standard treatment regimen (rifampicin-ethambutol-macrolide) in the treatment of M.avium complex pulmonary disease in a single centre non-blinded clinical trial.

The study, published in the CHEST journal, revealed that the clofazimine-ethambutol-macrolide regimen showed similar results to the standard rifampicin-ethambutol-macrolide regimen and should be considered in the MAC-PD treatment. In both the arms, the frequency of adverse events was similar but their nature was different.

Adult patients with MAC-PD were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive clofazimine (n=21) or rifampicin (n=19) as an adjunct to an ethambutol-macrolide backbone. The study's primary outcome was sputum culture conversion following six months of treatment.

The study led to the following findings:

  • After six months of treatment, both arms showed similar percentages of sputum culture conversion based on intention-to-treat analysis: 58% for rifampicin; and 62% for clofazimine.
  • Study discontinuation, mainly due to adverse events, was equal in both arms (26% versus 33%).
  • Based on an on-treatment analysis sputum culture conversion after 6 months of treatment was 79% in both groups.
  • In the clofazimine arm, diarrhoea was more prevalent (76% versus 37%), while arthralgia was more frequent in the rifampicin arm (37% versus 5%).
  • No difference in the frequency of QTc prolongation was seen between both groups.

"A clofazimine-ethambutol-macrolide regimen is noninferior to the standard rifampicin-ethambutol-macrolide regimen and should be considered in the treatment of M.avium complex pulmonary disease," the researchers wrote.

"Possible drug-drug interactions and individual patient characteristics should be taken into consideration when choosing an antibiotic regimen for MAC-PD," they concluded.

Reference:

Zweijpfenning, S. M., Aarnoutse, R., Boeree, M. J., Magis-Escurra, C., Stemkens, R., Geurts, B., Van Ingen, J., & Hoefsloot, W. (2023). Clofazimine is a safe and effective alternative for rifampicin in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease treatment – outcomes of a randomized trial. CHEST. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.11.038


Tags:    
Article Source : CHEST

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News