Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death worldwide. The most common sign of CAD is the stiffening and narrowing of blood vessels that supply the heart, a condition called coronary artery stenosis (CAS). Studies have shown that patients with CAD are more likely to suffer from acute PE and have reduced life expectancy after PE is discovered. However, the effect of a “double hit” of CAS and PE on RV function has not been well studied
To understand possible associations between CAS, acute PE, and RV function, a team of Chinese researchers conducted a multicenter study of patients who were treated for acute PE. The team was led by Professor Zhi-Cheng Jing from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, and featured Dr. Yue-Jiao Ma and Ms. Jie-Ling Ma from Peking Union Medical College, Dr. Dan Lu from Peking University Aerospace Center Hospital, as well as other collaborators from Peking Union Medical College and Hebei Medical University. Their findings have been published in Volume 138, Issue 16 of the Chinese Medical Journal on August 20, 2025.
Describing the need for this research, Prof. Jing said, “The potential role of pre-existing CAS in acute PE remains poorly understood. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to investigate the association between pre-existing CAS and RV dysfunction in patients with acute PE.”
The team looked through the records of patients who had been treated for acute PE between 2016 and 2020 across all participating centers. They identified 89 patients (cases) who had pre-existing CAS, and matched them by age and other characteristics to 176 patients without CAS (controls) at a 1:2 ratio. They then compared cardiac dysfunction markers, PE severity metrics, and prevalence of co-morbidities in case and control patients.
To their surprise, the team found that patients with CAS had fewer signs of RV strain than those without. On average, case patients had lower heart rates, lower NT-proBNP levels (a biomarker of cardiac strain), and a lower prevalence of elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (≥40 mmHg). What made this result surprising is that case patients also had a much higher prevalence rate of co-morbidities linked to PE, such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and atherosclerosis.
“CAS was independently and negatively associated with RV dysfunction,” said Prof. Jing when discussing the findings. He added, “There was a stronger negative association between stenosis of the left anterior descending artery and RV dysfunction,” to point out that some coronary arteries had a greater effect than others. In their analysis, the team found that CAS was an independent protective factor, reducing the risk of RV dysfunction among case patients by nearly threefold.
Moreover, case patients with narrowing in two or more coronary arteries had even lower rates of RV dysfunction and other markers of cardiac stress than those with stenosis in only one artery. While the mechanisms remain uncertain, the researchers suggest that compensatory changes to the heart, such as collateral vessel growth and myocardial adaptation, or medication use (e.g. statins) could contribute to these paradoxical findings.
These findings hold crucial implications for the diagnosis and treatment of acute PE, especially concerning accurately identifying patients at risk of RV dysfunction. “This study alerts physicians to pay closer attention to changes in RV function in patients with pre-existing CAS during the long-term management of acute PE,” concludes Prof. Jing
One hopes that future research will help all patients with acute pulmonary embolism receive timely care appropriate to their risk status.
Reference: Ma, Yuejiao1,2; Ma, Jieling2; Lu, Dan3; Yang, Yinjian1; Liu, Chao4; Wang, Liting4; Zhu, Xijie4; Li, Xianmei4; Cheng, Chunyan4; Zhang, Sijin4; Qiu, Jiayong5; Li, Jinghui6; Liu, Mengyi4; Sun, Kai1; Jiang, Xin4; Xu, Xiqi2; Jing, Zhi-Cheng4. Coronary artery stenosis associated with right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism: A case-control study. Chinese Medical Journal 138(16):p 2028-2036, August 20, 2025. | DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003729
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.