Single-use flexible bronchoscopes are non-inferior to reusable flexible bronchoscopes

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-06-16 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-06-17 06:49 GMT

Single-use flexible bronchoscopes are non-inferior to reusable flexible bronchoscopes in routine bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, and biopsy suggests a new study published in the BMC Pulmonary MedicineSingle-use flexible bronchoscopes(SFB) eliminate the risk of bronchoscopy-related infection compared with traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes(RFB). At present, there is no...

Login or Register to read the full article

Single-use flexible bronchoscopes are non-inferior to reusable flexible bronchoscopes in routine bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, and biopsy suggests a new study published in the BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Single-use flexible bronchoscopes(SFB) eliminate the risk of bronchoscopy-related infection compared with traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes(RFB). At present, there is no comparative study between SFB and RFB in the aspects of biopsy and interventional therapy. This study aims to explore whether SFB can perform complex bronchoscopic procedures such as transbronchial biopsies just like RFB.

They conducted a prospective controlled study. A total of 45 patients who required bronchoscopic biopsy in our hospital from June 2022 to December 2022 were enrolled. The patients were divided into the SFB group and the RFB group, and routine bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, and biopsy were performed respectively. Data on the time of routine bronchoscopy, the recovery rate of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF), biopsy time, and bleeding volume were collected. Then we used the two-sample t-test and the χ2 test to assess the performance differences between SFB and RFB. We also designed a questionnaire to compare the performance between SFB and RFB by different bronchoscope operators.

Results

The routine examination time of SFB and RFB was 3.40 ± 0.50 min and 3.55 ± 0.42 min, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.308). The recovery rate of BALF was (46.56 ± 8.22) % in the SFB group and (47.00 ± 8.07) in the RFB group, without a significant difference between the two groups(P = 0.863). The biopsy time was similar(4.67 ± 0.51 min VS 4.57 ± 0.45 min) in both groups, with no significant difference(P = 0.512). The positive biopsy rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant difference. Overall, the bronchoscope operators were generally satisfied with SFB.

SFBs are non-inferior to RFBs in routine bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, and biopsy. It is suggested that SFBs have a wider clinical application.

Reference:

He, S., Xie, L., Liu, J. et al. Single-use flexible bronchoscopes vs traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes: a prospective controlled study. BMC Pulm Med 23, 202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02478-5

Keywords:

He, S., Xie, L., Liu, Single-use, flexible, bronchoscopes, traditional, reusable, flexible, bronchoscopes, prospective,controlled study, BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Tags:    
Article Source : BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News