Tobacco Exposure Doesn’t Affect Biologic Treatment for Severe Asthma, Study Shows
Denmark: A recent study published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice found that ex-smokers with severe asthma respond to biologic treatments as effectively as never-smokers.
The analysis, which included 1,129 patients (44% ex-smokers with varying pack-years), showed significant improvements in asthma control, lung function, exacerbations, and biomarkers after one year of treatment, regardless of smoking history. No major differences in outcomes were observed between never-smokers and ex-smokers.
Randomized trials of biologics in severe, uncontrolled asthma have excluded patients with more than 10 pack-years of cumulative tobacco exposure, leaving a gap in our understanding of how smoking affects the clinical outcomes of biologic treatments in severe asthma. Since many asthma patients are current or former smokers, it is clinically important to investigate how tobacco exposure might influence the effectiveness of biologic therapy.
Marianne Baastrup Soendergaard, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital–Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark, and colleagues aimed to explore the impact of smoking history and tobacco exposure on the effectiveness of biologic treatment in real-life patients with severe asthma.
For this purpose, the researchers utilized data from the complete nationwide cohort of patients with severe asthma receiving biologics, sourced from the Danish Severe Asthma Register. They classified patients based on smoking history and cumulative tobacco exposure, then analyzed data at baseline and after 12 months of biologic treatment.
The study led to the following findings:
- 724 bio-naive patients were identified in the Danish Severe Asthma Register.
- Of these, 398 patients had never smoked (55%), 316 were former smokers (44%), and 10 were current smokers (1%).
- Among the current and former smokers, 37% had 1 to 9 pack-years of tobacco exposure, 26% had 10 to 19 pack-years, and 37% had 20 or more pack-years.
- Patients with tobacco exposure experienced similar reductions in the number of exacerbations, reductions in maintenance oral corticosteroid use, and improvements in asthma symptoms compared to patients with no tobacco exposure (0 pack-years).
The provides valuable insights into the impact of smoking history on the effectiveness of biologics in patients with severe asthma. Nearly half of the patients in this real-life cohort had significant smoking histories, highlighting the clinical relevance of the findings. Given the high cost and limited availability of biologic drugs, it is crucial to identify patients who will benefit from treatment. The study shows that smoking history and tobacco exposure do not affect the beneficial effects of biologics in these patients.
"Therefore, biologics should be prescribed to patients with severe asthma and a significant smoking history using the same criteria as for non-smokers. However, due to the small number of current smokers in the study, further research is needed to assess the impact of active smoking on biologic treatment outcomes," the researchers wrote.
Reference:
Baastrup Soendergaard M, Hansen S, Bjerrum AS, von Bülow A, Haakansson KEJ, Hilberg O, Ingebrigtsen TS, Johnsen CR, Lock-Johansson S, Makowska Rasmussen L, Schmid JM, Ulrik CS, Porsbjerg C. Tobacco Exposure and Efficacy of Biologic Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma: A Nationwide Study From the Danish Severe Asthma Register. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jan;12(1):146-155.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Oct 11. PMID: 37832820.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.