Urinary LAM, a Non-Invasive Tool for Serial TB Monitoring, Suggests Research
Written By : Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By : Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2026-03-12 14:45 GMT | Update On 2026-03-12 14:45 GMT
Greece: Researchers have found in a new study that urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) levels closely reflect patterns seen in sputum samples, suggesting that urine can serve as a reliable, non-invasive specimen for monitoring tuberculosis over time. However, results with low baseline LAM levels should be interpreted cautiously. Larger studies are needed to further validate these findings.
The correspondence, published in Tropical Medicine and Health, was authored by Vasiliki Kolokotroni from the Department of Respiratory Medicine at the University of Thessaly, Greece, and colleagues. Monitoring treatment response in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains a clinical challenge, particularly in patients who are unable to expectorate sputum. Building on prior work evaluating the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay in sputum, the researchers explored whether the same assay could be applied to urine samples for diagnostic and longitudinal monitoring purposes.
Nine adults with confirmed pulmonary TB were followed at the University Hospital of Larissa. Urine samples were collected at treatment initiation and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM), a mycobacterial cell wall component, was measured using the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay, with concentrations of 10 pg/mL or greater considered positive. The assay was used off-label for urine, and a simplified heat and centrifugation protocol was applied before testing.
Key Takeaways:
- Urinary LAM positivity was most frequently observed between weeks 4 and 12 of anti-tubercular therapy.
- Three distinct kinetic patterns were noted during follow-up.
- Patients with high baseline urinary LAM levels showed a marked early decline after treatment initiation.
- Those with intermediate baseline levels demonstrated gradual and consistent reductions over time.
- Individuals with very low initial LAM concentrations exhibited fluctuating or occasionally rising values during therapy.
- The urinary LAM trends closely paralleled previously reported sputum-based LAM trajectories.
- One patient treated based on clinical and radiological findings, despite negative culture results, had positive urinary LAM at baseline, supporting its potential diagnostic utility.
- A patient with extensive cavitary disease showed a pronounced peak in urinary LAM levels during follow-up, possibly indicating a higher bacillary burden.
- Two patients with non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection also had detectable urinary LAM, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation.
The authors acknowledged several limitations. The small sample size limits generalizability, and follow-up is ongoing, meaning complete longitudinal data are not yet available for all participants. Additionally, the assay’s performance in urine has not been formally validated.
Despite these constraints, the findings suggest that urinary LAM monitoring may offer a practical and non-invasive approach for serial assessment of TB treatment response. The researchers also proposed that more frequent early sampling could help clarify rapid post-treatment changes in urinary LAM levels.
Overall, these preliminary observations support further investigation of urine-based LAM testing as a complementary tool in pulmonary TB management.
Reference:
Kolokotroni, V., Gerogianni, I., Gourgoulianis, K.I. et al. Longitudinal urinary LAM measurements in pulmonary tuberculosis patients: preliminary observations. Trop Med Health 54, 35 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-026-00910-0
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.