Vitamin D supplements don't lower risk of acute respiratory tract infection: Lancet

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-01-19 04:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-01-19 09:47 GMT

Australia: Monthly doses of vitamin D supplementation (60000 IU) does not reduce the risk of acute respiratory tract infection but slightly reduced the duration of symptoms, according to a recent study. The findings of the study, published in the journal Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology, suggest that routine supplementation of vitamin D in vitamin D replete people, is unlikely to...

Login or Register to read the full article

Australia: Monthly doses of vitamin D supplementation (60000 IU) does not reduce the risk of acute respiratory tract infection but slightly reduced the duration of symptoms, according to a recent study. The findings of the study, published in the journal Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology, suggest that routine supplementation of vitamin D in vitamin D replete people, is unlikely to have clinically relevant effect on acute respiratory tract infection.

Observational studies have shown vitamin D deficiency to be linked to acute respiratory tract infection but results obtained from randomized controlled trials have been heterogeneousHai Pham, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, and colleagues aimed to determine if supplementation with monthly doses of vitamin D reduces the duration, risk, and severity of respiratory tract infections. 

For the purpose, the researchers used data from the D-Health Trial -- a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of monthly vitamin D supplementation. The pre-specified of the trial was acute respiratory infection.

Between Jan 13, 2014, and May 26, 2015, 421 207 invitations were sent, 40 824 people were interested in participating, and 21 315 participants were recruited and randomised. Of the 16 000 participants selected for potential analysis of survey data, 15 373 were included in the analysis; 295 in the vitamin D group and 332 in the placebo group who were missing data for all five annual surveys were excluded from the analysis. Of the 3800 selected for potential analysis of diary data, 3070 were invited to complete the diaries because 730 had already withdrawn. 2598 people were included in the analysis; 218 people in the vitamin D group and 254 in the placebo group were missing data and were therefore excluded from the analysis. 

Key findings of the study include:

  • In blood samples collected from randomly sampled participants throughout the trial, the mean serum 25(OH)D concentration was 114·8 (SD 30·3) nmol/L in the vitamin D group and 77·5 (25·2) nmol/L in the placebo group.
  • Vitamin D supplementation did not reduce the risk of acute respiratory tract infection (survey OR 0·98; diary OR 0·98).
  • Analyses of diary data showed reductions in the overall duration of symptoms and of severe symptoms, but these were small and unlikely to be clinically significant.

"Monthly bolus doses of 60 000 IU of vitamin D did not reduce the overall risk of acute respiratory tract infection, but could slightly reduce the duration of symptoms in the general population," wrote the authors.

"These findings suggest that routine vitamin D supplementation of a population that is largely vitamin D replete is unlikely to have a clinically relevant effect on acute respiratory tract infection," they concluded. 

"The effect of vitamin D supplementation on acute respiratory tract infection in older Australian adults: an analysis of data from the D-Health Trial," is published in the journal Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology.

DOI: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(20)30380-6/fulltext

Tags:    
Article Source : Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News